I like this illustration of a scene in Jules Vernes’s Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea (1870) even more because it has at least one mistake in it. At least, I think it’s a mistake: the jellyfish on the upper left are two Portuguese men-o’-war (really colonial hydrozoans, not jellyfish). They have gas-filled float-bladders, so in reality you see them only on the surface, not hanging in midwater like that. The mistake makes the scene like a dream. The absence of colour is good too: it fixes the illustration firmly in the past and the colours you imagine are more vivid. The artist is imagining, dreaming, conjuring a vision of an oneiric ocean.
Overlord In Terms of Core Issues Around Maximal Engagement with Key Notions of the Über-Feral 
Science mistakes can make for vivid images. There’s a good moment in Terry Pratchett’s book Going Postal, where he writes about how sinking ships reach a point where the water is dense enough to support their weight (and they begin an endless voyage on a sea beneath the sea.)
This is wrong – water has about the same density everywhere, and sinking ships go straight to the bottom. But I feel strongly that it should be right.
This is wrong – water has about the same density everywhere, and sinking ships go straight to the bottom. But I feel strongly that it should be right.
Are you sure it’s a mistake rather than different physics on Discworld? But I don’t like Pratchett. A Guardian-reader.