Middlemoth

I’ve never read Middlemarch (1871). But I have seen a middlemoth. It was when I was looking at a new way of creating fractLs. A fractL is what I call a graph shaped like a capital L, with the x- and y-axes representing values between 0 and 1, like 1/2 and 1/3 and 8/55. You can also use numbers > 1 to create numbers < 1: 73 → 0.73; 128719 → 0.128719; and so on. But I decided to reverse the integer before converting it: 73 → 0.37; 128719 → 0.917821; and so on. And use different bases for the x- and y-axes. So that’s what I did on a fractL: I mapped fractions converted from integers in one base against fractions converted from integers in another base. The results, as you can see, were spectacularly dull:

fractL for int→frac in base 2 and base 6


fractL for int→frac in base 3 and base 6


fractL b04, b06


fractL b06, b08


So I decided to try some perspectivision, mapping the integer-fractions not on a fractL but on a fractO instead. A fractO is a circle where you find a point inside the circle by using two fractions, fr1 and fr2, to create two radian values: θ1 = fr1 * 2 * π and θ2 = fr2 * 2 * π. Then you use θ1 and θ2 to find two points on the perimeter of the circle, (x1, y1) and (x2, y2), and then find their midpoint, (x3, y3) = ((x1, y1) + (x2, y2)) / 2. The results this time are much more pleasing on the eye:

fractO for integers in base 2 and base 6

fractL b02, b06, for fractO b02, b06


Here’s an animated gif showing the conversion from visually dull fractL to visually interesting fractO:

fractL b02b06 to fractO b02b06 (animated at EZgif)


When I was looking at more fractOs, I found one that was lepidopterally interesting too:

fractO b09, b12 with middlemoth


fractO b09, b12 (middlemoth in green)


You can try spotting more pareidolia in more fractOs from reversed fractintegers:

fractO b03, b15

fractL b03, b15 for fractO above


fractL b03b15 to fractO b03b15 (animated at EZgif)


fractO b02, b10


fractO b02, b12


fractO b02, b14


fractO b03, b06


fractO b03, b12


fractO b03, b21


fractO b04, b06


fractO b04, b20


fractO b06, b08


fractO b09, b15


fractO b10, b24


fractO b12, b16


fractO b15, b20


fractO b24, b28


fractO b42, b78


fractO b02, b18 (fr2 x 3)


fractO b02, b06 (fr2 x 3)

Altars of Mathness

What could be duller than digits? They just sit there on the page or screen, mindlessly marking mathematics:

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100…

But perhaps they become more interesting as images. Let’s display the final digit of the integers, or counting numbers, on a graph. Running left-right and up-down, the graph represents the final or rightmost digit of 1, 2, 3, … 10, 11, 12, 13, … 100, 101, 102, 103, …, 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, …:

Rightmost single digit of the integers (click for larger)


No, that’s still dull: the graph just generates endlessly repeating triangles. After all, the final digits fall into a cycle: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 0, 1, 2, 3… So do the final two digits: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, […] 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 00, 01, 02, 03… Here they are as a graph:

Rightmost two digits of the integers


Now the triangles look like waves sweeping to shore. That’s a bit more interesting, but not much. So let’s try something different. The trailing digits of the integers generate triangles, so let’s see what the triangular numbers generate. The triangular numbers — 0, 1, 3, 6, 10, 15, 21… — are very simple to form. You just sum the integers: 1, 3 = 1 + 2, 6 = 1 + 2 + 3, 10 = 1 + 2 + 3 + 4, 15 = 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5, 21 = 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6, 28 = 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7, 36 = 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + 8, 45 = 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + 8 + 9, 55 = 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + 8 + 9 + 10… Here are the final digits of the triangulars — 1, 3, 6, 0, 5, 1, 8, 6… — as a graph:

Final digit of triangular numbers in base 10 (click for larger)


Now something interesting has appeared. The final digits form a repeated palindromic pattern (counting 0 as the zero-th triangular number):

0, 1, 3, 6, 0, 5, 1, 8, 6, 5, 5, 6, 8, 1, 5, 0, 6, 3, 1, 0, 0, 1, 3, 6, 0, 5, 1, 8, 6, 5, 5, 6, 8, 1, 5, 0, 6, 3, 1, 0, 0, 1, 3, 6, 0, 5, 1, 8, 6, 5, 5, 6, 8, 1, 5, 0, 6, 3, 1, 0, 0, 1, 3, 6, 0, 5, 1, 8, 6, 5, 5, 6, 8, 1, 5, 0, 6, 3, 1, 0, …

An Altar of Mathness created by the final digit of triangular numbers in base 10


And those palindromic digits create symmetric shapes that remind me of little altars — let’s call them “altars of mathness” in tribute to Morbid Angel’s genre-defining album Altars of Madness (1989). And what about the final two digits of the triangular numbers? Here’s the graph (adjusted so that 99 fits into the same space as 9):

Final two digits of triangulars in b10


Final two triangular digits in b10 (horizontal scale compressed)


The final two digits form palindromes too. And this time we don’t get just triangles, but curves too. But that’s in base 10. What happens with the trailing triangular digits in other bases? Well, here’s the final triangular digit creating more altars of mathness in different bases (note that the altars are more elaborate in even bases):

Final triangular digit in base 4


Final triangular digit in b5


Final triangular digit in b6


Final triangular digit in b7


Final triangular digit in b8


Final triangular digit in b9


Final triangular digit in b14


And here’s the graph for the final triangular digit in base 100:

Final triangular digit in b100


The graph for final single digit in b100 should look familiar, because it’s identical to the graph for final double triangular digits in b10:

Final two digits of triangulars in b10


That’s because two digits in b10 are equivalent in one digit in b100, four digits in b10 are equivalent to two digits in b100, and so on. But b100 can’t capture three digits in b10 (the graph is again adjusted so that 999 fits into the same space as 9 and 99 above):

Final three triangular digits in b10


If you compress the x-axis for that graph, you can see how long the symmetries are:

Final three triangular digits in b10 (x-axis / 2)


Final three triangular digits in b10 (x-axis / 4)


The final four digits of the triangulars in b10 create even longer symmetries:

Final quadruple triangular digits in b10


Final quadruple triangular digits in b10 (x-axis / 2)


Final quadruple triangular digits in b10 (x-axis / 8)


Note how, as the length of the final digits rises, you need to compress the x-axis more and more to see the symmetries. But integer sequences obviously don’t end with the counting numbers and triangulars. What about squares and powers of n? What about primes and Fibonacci numbers? Here’s the final two digits of the squares — 1, 4, 9, 16, 25, 49, 64, 81, 100, 121, 144, 169… — in b10:

Final two digits of the squares in b10


It’s reminiscent of the triangular numbers (so are the final-digit graphs for other polygonal numbers). So what about the powers of 2? That’s 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, 512, 1024… Here’s the graph for final single digits of 2^p in b10:

Final single digits of 2^p in b10


This time there’s repetition, but not symmetry. Here’s the graph for final double digits, or 2-digits, of 2^p in b10:

Final 2-dig of 2^p in b10


Now the graph looks a little like a range of eroded mountains. Now try dig-4, the final four digits of 2^p in b10:

Final 4-dig of 2^p in b10


The patterns are similar to those of dig-2 and don’t need compressing in the x-axis. This similarity and lack of need for compression are true of any number of final digits in 2^p. The final 10 digits look like this:

Final 10-dig of 2^p in b10


And the final 20 and 30 digits like this:

Final 20-dig of 2^p in b10


Final 30-dig of 2^p in b10


Powers don’t behave like polygonals: the finals are fractals. That is, the final digits create similar patterns at all scales: 1-dig, 2-dig, 10-dig, 100-dig, 1000-dig and so on. That’s true in other bases:

Final 5-dig of 3^p in b2


But a glimpse of b2 is all you’re going to get of other bases. There are other fish to fry — Fibonacci fish. The Fibonacci sequence, whose terms are equal to the sum of the previous two numbers (after seeding with “1, 1”), starts like this: 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, 144, 233, 377, 610, 987, 1597, 2584, 4181, 6765, 10946, 17711, 28657, 46368, 75025, 121393, 196418, 317811… And what about the graphs for final fib-digits? As you’ll see, final Fib-digits are fractal too. Indeed, Fibonacci final-graphs look like 2-power final-graphs (in a way, Fibonacci numbers are powers of φ = 1.6180339887498948482…). The patterns are similar at all scales. And they remind me of the skyline of a ruined city in an Oriental tale, with collapsed domes and crumbling minarets:

Final 1-dig of Fibonacci numbers in b10


Final 2-fibdig in b10


Final 3-fibdig in b10


Final 4-fibdig in b10


Final 5-fibdig in b10


Final 10-fibdig in b10


Final 15-fibdig in b10


Final 20-fibdig in b10


Final 25-fibdig in b10


So final fibdigs are fractal. But final prime digits aren’t:

Final 1-digit of primes in b10


Final 1-digit of primes in b5


Final 2-digit of primes in b10


Primes aren’t final-digitally fractal like Fibonaccis and powers of 2. But there’s occasional symmetry in the prime fin-digs. I’ve marked some palindromic patterns in red and green:

Palindromic patterns in final 1-digits of the primes in b10 (click for larger)


The palindromic patterns, or pal-pats, in the primes look like the altars of mathness in the triangulars. They’re created by digital palindromes like these:

19, 23, 29 (c=3)
347, 349, 353, 359, 367 (c=5)
937, 941, 947, 953, 967, 971, 977 (c=7)
1951, 1973, 1979, 1987, 1993, 1997, 1999, 2003, 2011 (c=9)
26423, 26431, 26437, 26449, 26459, 26479, 26489, 26497, 26501, 26513 (c=10)


Here are the first few pal-pats in the primes (note that 157, 163, 167 and 163, 167, 173 overlap):

2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29, 31, 37, 41, 43, 47, 53, 59, 61, 67, 71, 73, 79, 83, 89, 97, 101, 103, 107, 109, 113, 127, 131, 137, 139, 149, 151, 157, 163, 167, 173, 179, 181, 191, 193, 197, 199, 211, 223, 227, 229, 233, 239, 241, 251, 257, 263, 269, 271, 277, 281, 283, 293, 307, 311, 313, 317, 331, 337, 347, 349, 353, 359, 367, 373, 379, 383, 389, 397, 401, 409, 419, 421, 431, 433, 439, 443, 449, 457, 461, 463, 467, 479, 487, 491, 499, 503, 509, 521, 523, 541, 547, 557, 563, 569, 571, 577, 587, 593, 599, 601, 607…

And are there palindromes among the final 2-digits, 3-digits and higher n-digits of the primes in different bases? Yes, you can easily find some. But I haven’t put them on a graph yet:

Base 10 (2-dig)

58789, 58831, 58889 (c=3)
286873, 286927, 286973 (c=3)
360649, 360653, 360749 (c=3)
404851, 404941, 404951 (c=3)
590437, 590489, 590537 (c=3)
623071, 623107, 623171 (c=3)
651517, 651587, 651617 (c=3)


Base 6 (2-dig)

300335, 300401, 300441, 300501, 300535 (c=5) (23459 to 23531 in base 10)
1030255, 1030331, 1030351, 1030431, 1030455 (c=5) (50651 to 50723 in b10)
1140451, 1140501, 1140521, 1141001, 1141051 (c=5) (59791 to 59863 in b10)
1402451, 1402545, 1403031, 1403045, 1403051 (c=5) (78367 to 78439 in b10)
1435431, 1435451, 1435505, 1435551, 1440031 (c=5) (82891 to 82963)
2400505, 2401001, 2401015, 2401101, 2401105 (c=5) (124601 to 124673)
2442235, 2442311, 2442351, 2442411, 2442435 (c=5) (130127 to 130199)
2444215, 2444225, 2444311, 2444325, 2444415 (c=5) (130547 to 130619)
2533105, 2533121, 2533215, 2533221, 2533305 (c=5) (136769 to 136841)


Base 4 (3-dig)

20013013, 20013133, 20020013 (c=3) (33223 to 33287 in base 10)
21031111, 21031303, 21032111 (c=3) (37717 to 37781)
22310011, 22310333, 22311011 (c=3) (44293 to 44357)
33030121, 33031001, 33031121 (c=3) (62233 to 62297)
102031333, 102032131, 102032333 (c=3) (74623 to 74687)
110013121, 110013311, 110020121 (c=3) (82393 to 82457)


Base 3 (3-dig)

112121020012, 112121021211, 112121022021, 112121100211, 112121101012 (c=5) (287393 to 287501 in base 10)
202002212002, 202002212101, 202002220001, 202002221101, 202010000002 (c=5) (395741 to 395849)
1001012111212, 1001012112202, 1001012121022, 1001012121202, 1001012122212 (c=5) (555143 to 555251)
1010112112012, 1010112112201, 1010112120222, 1010112121201, 1010112200012 (c=5) (601079 to 601187)
1011202211211, 1011202212212, 1011202220022, 1011202221212, 1011202222211 (c=5) (625369 to 625477)


Base 2 (5-dig)

101110001111101, 101110010000111, 101110010001001, 101110010100111, 101110010111101 (c=5) (23677 to 23741 in base 10)
10000001000111101, 10000001001011001, 10000001001110001, 10000001001111001, 10000001001111101 (c=5) (66109 to 66173)
10111100110011011, 10111100110011111, 10111100110111001, 10111100110111111, 10111100111011011 (c=5) (96667 to 96731)
11010000111110001, 11010001000001101, 11010001000011001, 11010001000101101, 11010001000110001 (c=5) (106993 to 107057)

And I conjecture that you’ll get palindromes for any number of final digits in all bases. And can these palindromes be of arbitrary length? Again, I conjecture so. There are infinitely many primes and very rare patterns can occur infinitely often in an infinite set of numbers.


Post-Performative Post-Scriptum

Here’s Dan Seagrave’s classic cover for Morbid Angel’s Altars of Madness (1989):


Morbid Angel — official website
Dan Seagrave — official website


Elsewhere Other-Accessible…

Formulas Focal to the Flesh — a pre-previous post paronomasizing the title of a Morbid-Angel album…

Strartifacts

Here’s a sequence of decreasing numbers. Which number comes next?

612 → 600 → 594 → 414 → 398 → 182 → ?

It’s 166, because the numbers decrease by the product of their digits higher than 0:

612 – 6*2 = 612 – 12 = 600 → 600 – 6 = 594 → 594 – 5*9*4 = 594 – 180 = 414 → 414 – 4*4 = 414 – 16 = 398 → 398 – 3*9*8 = 398 – 216 = 166

Eventually the sequence will reached 0 and stop. If you want to see how this function looks on a graph, here it is:

x = n <= 3722, f(i) -= digmul(f(i)) → 0 (click for larger)


The graph represents n on the x-axis, with the red circles marking n = 100 and n = 1000. The sequence of falling digit-products is on the y-axis, but the graph has a special feature there. The y-axis is compressed according to the size of n, so that n = 1000 falls to 0 with n -= digmul(n) in the same height as n = 100. Here’s a graph for the same function in base 7:

x = n <= 3722 in base 7, f(i) -= digmul(f(i)) → 0


Now the red circles represent 7^2 = 49, 7^3 = 343, 7^4 = 2401, i.e. 100b7, 1000b7, 10000b7. And you can try other functions for n = n – func(n) = n -= func(n). Here’s a graph for n -= hailstep(n), where hailstep(n) returns the number of steps in the Collatz sequence for n:

x = n <= 3722 in base 7, f(i) -= hailstep(f(i)) → f(i) < 2


You form a Collatz sequence by starting with a whole number and finding the next number according to two rules:

1. If n(i) is divisible by 2, n(i+1) = n(i) / 2
2. If n(i) is not divisible by 2, n(i+1) = n(i) * 3 + 1

So the Collatz sequence for n = 10 looks like this:

10 → 10 / 2 = 5 → 5 * 3 + 1 = 16 → 16 / 2 = 8 → 8 / 2 = 4 → 4 / 2 = 2 → 2 / 2 = 1.

When you reach 1, you stop. So that’s six steps for n = 10. But does every n reach 1 in the end? It’s a very simple question about a very simple function. But nobody knows and nobody can prove that either all numbers do or at least one number doesn’t. The German mathematician Lothar Collatz (1910-90) conjectured that all numbers do reach 1. But it can take a surprisingly long time, even with small n. This is the Collatz sequence for n = 27:

27, 82, 41, 124, 62, 31, 94, 47, 142, 71, 214, 107, 322, 161, 484, 242, 121, 364, 182, 91, 274, 137, 412, 206, 103, 310, 155, 466, 233, 700, 350, 175, 526, 263, 790, 395, 1186, 593, 1780, 890, 445, 1336, 668, 334, 167, 502, 251, 754, 377, 1132, 566, 283, 850, 425, 1276, 638, 319, 958, 479, 1438, 719, 2158, 1079, 3238, 1619, 4858, 2429, 7288, 3644, 1822, 911, 2734, 1367, 4102, 2051, 6154, 3077, 9232, 4616, 2308, 1154, 577, 1732, 866, 433, 1300, 650, 325, 976, 488, 244, 122, 61, 184, 92, 46, 23, 70, 35, 106, 53, 160, 80, 40, 20, 10, 5, 16, 8, 4, 2, 1

Now some more functions for the y-compressed fall-bands, as I call them. If you use the sum of the factors * powers, you get this:

x = n <= 7422, f(i) -= factpowsum(f(i)) → f(i) < 2


The factpowsum(n) is the sum of the factors multiplied by their powers. For example, 37692 = 2^2 * 3^3 * 349, so factpowsum(4188) = 2*2 + 3*3 + 349*1 = 362. Here’s factpowsum for more n:

x = n <= 14822, f(i) -= factpowsum(f(i)) → f(i) < 2


You can also use the very simple function f(i) -= 1, that is, compress the numbers from n to 1 into the y-gap. But if you do that, you’ll get a completely filled screen:

x = n <= 3722, f(i) -= 1 → f(i) = 0


So you can adjust the color of a pixel according to how many times it’s written to:

x = n <= 1862, f(i) -= 1 → f(i) = 0 (color-adjust)


The patterns in the colors are artifacts of the limited resolution of the screen, so I call these patterns strartifacts = strata + artifacts. Here’s another example:

x = n <= 3722, f(i) -= 1 → f(i) = 0 (color-adjust)


Or adjust the greytone of the pixel:

x = n <= 3722, f(i) -= 1 → f(i) = 0 (greytone-adjust)


And so on (in all cases, you can click for a larger image):

x = n <= 1862, f(i) -= blockmul(f(i)) (multiply run-lengths of same digits) → f(i) < 2


x is triangular(n) = 3 to 1734453, y is 1 < triangular numbers <= n


x = n <= , f(i) -= 1 → f(i) < 2


x = n <= 7442, f(i) -= 1 → f(i) < 2


x = n <= 1862, f(i) -= leaddig(f(i)) → f(i) < 2 # 1


x = n <= , f(i) -= leaddig(f(i)) → f(i) < 2 # 2


x = n <= , f(i) -= trailingdigit(f(i)) + 1 → f(i) < 2


x = n <= , f(i) -= trailingdigit(f(i) in base 5) + 3 → f(i) < 2


for triangular(n) = 3 to 6928503, f(i) -= primes → f(i) < 2



x = n <= 1862, f(i) -= blockmul(f(i) in base 5) (multiply run-lengths of same digits) → f(i) < 2


x = n <= 1862, f(i) -= blockmul(f(i) in base 2) → f(i) < 2


x = n <= 1862, f(i) -= digsum(f(i)) → f(i) < 2


x = n <= 3722, f(i) -= func(x = 1/4 → x < 0, x(1) = 4) → f(i) < 2


x = n <= 932, f(i) -= func(x -= 3/x → x < 0, x(1) = 6) → f(i) < 2


Fibonacci Friday Factors

Today’s a Phiday Friday or Φiday Friday or Φriday, so let’s have some more Fibonacci Fun. Here is the famous Fibonacci sequence, where each number (after seeding with “0, 1”) is formed by adding the previous two numbers:

0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, 144, 233, 377, 610, 987, 1597, 2584, 4181, 6765, 10946, 17711, 28657, 46368, 75025, 121393, 196418, 317811, 514229, 832040, 1346269, 2178309, 3524578, 5702887, 9227465, 14930352, 24157817, 39088169, 63245986, 102334155, … — A000045 at the Online Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences (OEIS)

It’s obvious that the numbers get bigger for ever and that no number repeats except 1. But what happens to the final digit of the Fibonacci numbers, as underlined here?:

0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, 144, 233, 377, 610, 987, 1597, 2584, 4181, 6765, 10946, 17711, 28657, 46368, 75025, 121393, 196418, 317811, 514229, 832040, …

If you think about it, you’ll realize that the final digit has to repeat. Look for the “0, 1, 1” re-appearing:

0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 3, 1, 4, 5, 9, 4, 3, 7, 0, 7, 7, 4, 1, 5, 6, 1, 7, 8, 5, 3, 8, 1, 9, 0, 9, 9, 8, 7, 5, 2, 7, 9, 6, 5, 1, 6, 7, 3, 0, 3, 3, 6, 9, 5, 4, 9, 3, 2, 5, 7, 2, 9, 1, 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 3, 1, 4, 5, 9, 4, 3, 7, 0, 7, 7, 4, 1, 5, 6, 1, 7, 8, 5, 3, 8, 1, 9, 0, 9, 9, 8, 7, 5, 2, 7, 9, 6, 5, … — A003893 at the OEIS, “a(n) = Fibonacci(n) mod 10”

As you’ll see, all the numbers 0 to 9 appear in that sequence. But what about the final two digits of the Fibonacci sequence? Do all the numbers 0 to 99 appear before the sequence repeats?

0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, 44, 33, 77, 10, 87, 97, 84, 81, 65, 46, 11, 57, 68, 25, 93, 18, 11, 29, 40, 69, 9, 78, 87, 65, 52, 17, 69, 86, 55, 41, 96, 37, 33, 70, 3, 73, 76, 49, 25, 74, 99, 73, 72, 45, 17, 62, 79, 41, 20, 61, 81, 42, 23, 65, 88, 53, 41, 94, 35, 29, 64, … — A105471 at the OEIS, “a(n) = Fibonacci(n) mod 100”


And what about the the final three digits and the numbers 0 to 999?

0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, 144, 233, 377, 610, 987, 597, 584, 181, 765, 946, 711, 657, 368, 25, 393, 418, 811, 229, 40, 269, 309, 578, 887, 465, 352, 817, 169, 986, 155, 141, 296, 437, 733, 170, 903, 73, 976, 49, 25, 74, 99, 173, 272 … — A248740 at the OEIS, “a(n) = Fibonacci(n) mod 1000”


In fact, some numbers do go missing as the final block of digits gets longer. But all that is based on the representation of the Fibonacci numbers in base 10. What about other bases? I had a look at that question and came up with some interesting patterns when I represented the final-block numbers on an Ulam-like spiral, where numbers are represented as squares on a spiral rotating counter-clockwise. This is the spiral for powers of 2 (the red square marks the center of the spiral and the number 1):

Spiral of final Fib-digits modulo 2^p


Fib-spiral mod 2^p (smaller scale)


Fib-spiral mod 2^p (smaller scale still)


What fraction of numbers are missing from the spiral? Watch this space. In the meantime, here’s the Fib-spiral for powers of 3:

Fib-spiral mod 3^p


It’s completely filled, because no numbers are missing (the red square marks “1” at the center of the spiral). What about powers of 4? Well, we’ve already seen that Fib-spiral, because all powers of 4 are also powers of 2:

Fib-spiral mod 4^p


The Fib-spiral for powers of 5 is the same as the Fib-spiral for powers of 3: it’s completely filled again. But the Fib-spiral for powers of 6 is interesting:

Fib-spiral mod 6^p


Fib-spiral mod 6^p (smaller scale)


Fib-spiral mod 6^p (smaller scale still)


And here are more Fib-spirals and more interesting patterns:

Fib-spiral mod 7^p


Fib-spiral mod 10^p — identical to the Fib-spiral for 2^p


Fib-spiral mod 11^p


Fib-spiral mod 11^p (smaller scale)


Fib-spiral mod 13^p


Fib-spiral mod 13^p (smaller scale)


Fib-spiral mod 17^p


Fib-spiral mod 17^p (smaller scale)


Fib-spiral mod 19^p


Fib-spiral mod 19^p (smaller scale)


Fib-spiral mod 41^p


Fib-spiral mod 41^p (smaller scale)


Fib-spiral mod 47^p


Elsewhere Other-Accessible…

Friday is Φday — a first look at Phiday on Friday

Run Fun

I was looking at numbers where the digit-runs of n in one base, b1, represented the digits of n in another base, b2. To understand digit-runs, take the number 775555111 (in whatever base). The function digitrun(775555111) = 2,4,3, because reading 775555111 left-to-right you see two 7s, four 5s, three 1s. Here’s one pattern I found:

10000011111 in base 2 = 1055 in base 10. The digit runs of 10000011111 are 1,5,5 and 15530 = 105510 = 100000111112.
10000022222 in base 3 = 59291 in base 10. The digit runs of 10000022222 are again 1,5,5 and 155241 = 5929110 = 100000222223.
1000009999910 → 1,5,5 and 15599998 = 1000009999910

The pattern isn’t difficult to understand — what are 30+2 and 99998+2? — and it’s easy to prove that it applies to all standard bases. But I wondered how AI would go about the proof. Here’s the result:

For base b ≥ 2, let the largest digit be d = b − 1. Then

100000dddddb

has digit runs

1, 5, 5

so the run-length encoding is always

155.

The value of 155 is interpreted in base

b5 − 2,

because

155b5−2 = (b5−2)2 + 5(b5−2) + 5.

Thus

100000dddddb = 155b5−2.

Base b n = 100000(b−1)(b−1)(b−1)(b−1)(b−1)b Run Lengths Compressed Form Base-10 Value of n
2 100000111112 1,5,5 15530 1,055
3 100000222223 1,5,5 155241 59,291
4 100000333334 1,5,5 1551022 1,049,599
5 100000444445 1,5,5 1553123 9,765,624
6 100000555556 1,5,5 1557774 60,466,175
7 100000666667 1,5,5 15516805 282,475,248
8 100000777778 1,5,5 15532766 1,074,266,111
9 100000888889 1,5,5 15559047 3,486,270,320
10 1000009999910 1,5,5 15599998 10,000,099,999
11 100000AAAAA11 1,5,5 155161049 26,094,908,050
12 100000BBBBB12 1,5,5 155248830 62,191,972,031
13 100000CCCCC13 1,5,5 155371291 136,858,491,292
14 100000DDDDD14 1,5,5 155537822 281,793,968,543
15 100000EEEEE15 1,5,5 155759373 547,918,611,874
16 100000FFFFF16 1,5,5 1551048574 1,099,512,627,199
17 100000GGGGG17 1,5,5 1551419855 2,141,423,647,200
18 100000HHHHH18 1,5,5 1551889566 4,058,363,974,751
19 100000IIIII19 1,5,5 1552476097 7,502,570,010,432
20 100000JJJJJ20 1,5,5 1553199998 13,120,000,000,000

(Here A = 10, B = 11, …, J = 19.)

Proof for All b ≥ 2

The number

100000(b−1)(b−1)(b−1)(b−1)(b−1)b

has value

b10 + (b−1)(b4 + b3 + b2 + b + 1).

Since

b4 + b3 + b2 + b + 1 = (b5 − 1)/(b − 1),

this becomes

b10 + (b5 − 1) = b10 + b5 − 1.

Now let

B = b5 − 2.

Then

155B = B2 + 5B + 5.

Substituting B = b5 − 2:

(B2 + 5B + 5) = (b5−2)2 + 5(b5−2) + 5

= b10−4b5+4+5b5−10+5

= b10 + b5−1.

Hence

b10 + b5 − 1 = (b5 − 2)2+5(b5 − 2)+5

for every b ≥ 2.

Therefore,

100000(b−1)5b = 155b5−2.

This is exactly the pattern observed in bases 2 to 20, and it holds for all bases.

Matchin’ Fraction

I wondered whether contfrac(a/b), the continued fraction of a/b, ever matched the digits of a and b in some base. The answer was yes. But I haven’t found any examples in base 10:

3,1,2 = contfrac(3/12) in base 9 = contfrac(3/11) in base 10
4,1,3 = contfrac(4/13) in b16 = contfrac(4/19) in b10
5,1,45/14 in b25 = 5/29
6,1,56/15 in b36 = 6/41
25,22/52 in b9 = 2/47 → 23,2
7,1,67/16 in b49 = 7/55
8,1,78/17 in b64 = 8/71
9,1,89/18 in b81 = 9/89
A,1,9A/19 in b100 = 10/109 → 10,1,9
42,1,34/213 in b8 = 4/139 → 34,1,3
4,1,2,3,341/233 in b8 = 33/155
1,17,1,2,3117/123 in b14 = 217/227 → 1,21,1,2,3
3A,33/A3 in b28 = 3/283 → 94,3
3,5,A,235/A2 in b34 = 107/342 → 3,5,10,2
3,1,4,1,4,1,5314/1415 in b8 = 204/781
2,1,36,3,2213/632 in b12 = 303/902 → 2,1,42,3,2
3,2,11,2,2,2321/1222 in b9 = 262/911 → 3,2,10,2,2,2
4H,44/H4 in b65 = 4/1109 → 277,4
6,2,1,3,J62/13J in b35 = 212/1349 → 6,2,1,3,19
8,3,3,1,D83/31D in b22 = 179/1487 → 8,3,3,1,13
93,1,89/318 in b27 = 9/2222 → 246,1,8
1,3A,1,1,4,2,213A1/1422 in b12 = 2281/2330 → 1,46,1,1,4,2,2
C7,1,BC/71B in b21 = 12/3119 → 259,1,11
1,2,2,1,O,F122/1OF in b50 = 2602/3715 → 1,2,2,1,24,15
2,1,1,5,55211/555 in b28 = 1597/4065 → 2,1,1,5,145
3,1,1,A,K,6311/AK6 in b29 = 2553/8996 → 3,1,1,10,20,6
1,2[70],1,3,912[70]/139 in b98 = 9870/9907 → 1,266,1,3,9
1,E,4,1,M,71E4/1M7 in b100 = 11404/12207 → 1,14,4,1,22,7
LG,5,4L/G54 in b28 = 21/12688 → 604,5,4
G4,1,FG/41F in b64 = 16/16463 → 1028,1,15

Powers of Persistence

“The persistence of a number is the number of times you need to multiply the digits together before reaching a single digit.” — OEIS

Base 5

23 → 11 → 1 in b5 (c=3) (n=13 in b10)
233 → 33 → 14 → 4 in b5 (c=4) (n=68 in b10)
33334 → 2244 → 224 → 31 → 3 in b5 (c=5) (n=2344 in b10)
444444444444 → 13243332331 → 333124 → 1331 → 14 → 4 in b5 (c=6) (n=244140624 in b10)
3344444444444444444444 → 2244112144242244414 → 13243332331 → 333124 → 1331 → 14 → 4 in b5 (c=7) (n=1811981201171874 in b10)


Base 6

23 → 10 → 0 in b6 (c=3) (n=15 in b10)
35 → 23 → 10 → 0 in b6 (c=4) (n=23 in b10)
444 → 144 → 24 → 12 → 2 in b6 (c=5) (n=172 in b10)
24445 → 2544 → 424 → 52 → 14 → 4 in b6 (c=6) (n=3629 in b10)


Base 7

24 → 11 → 1 in b7 (c=3) (n=18 in b10)
36 → 24 → 11 → 1 in b7 (c=4) (n=27 in b10)
245 → 55 → 34 → 15 → 5 in b7 (c=5) (n=131 in b10)
4445 → 635 → 156 → 42 → 11 → 1 in b7 (c=6) (n=1601 in b10)
44556 → 6666 → 3531 → 63 → 24 → 11 → 1 in b7 (c=7) (n=11262 in b10)
5555555 → 443525 → 6666 → 3531 → 63 → 24 → 11 → 1 in b7 (c=8) (n=686285 in b10)
444555555555555666 → 465556434443526 → 115443241155 → 256641 → 4125 → 55 → 34 → 15 → 5 in b7 (c=9) (n=1086400325525346 in b10)


Base 8

24 → 10 → 0 in b8 (c=3) (n=20 in b10)
37 → 25 → 12 → 2 in b8 (c=4) (n=31 in b10)
256 → 74 → 34 → 14 → 4 in b8 (c=5) (n=174 in b10)
2777 → 1256 → 74 → 34 → 14 → 4 in b8 (c=6) (n=1535 in b10)
333555577 → 3116773 → 5126 → 74 → 34 → 14 → 4 in b8 (c=7) (n=57596799 in b10)


Base 9

25 → 11 → 1 in b9 (c=3) (n=23 in b10)
38 → 26 → 13 → 3 in b9 (c=4) (n=35 in b10)
57 → 38 → 26 → 13 → 3 in b9 (c=5) (n=52 in b10)
477 → 237 → 46 → 26 → 13 → 3 in b9 (c=6) (n=394 in b10)
45788 → 13255 → 176 → 46 → 26 → 13 → 3 in b9 (c=7) (n=30536 in b10)
2577777 → 275484 → 13255 → 176 → 46 → 26 → 13 → 3 in b9 (c=8) (n=1409794 in b10)


Base 10

25 → 10 → 0 (c=3)
39 → 27 → 14 → 4 (c=4)
77 → 49 → 36 → 18 → 8 (c=5)
679 → 378 → 168 → 48 → 32 → 6 (c=6)
6788 → 2688 → 768 → 336 → 54 → 20 → 0 (c=7)
68889 → 27648 → 2688 → 768 → 336 → 54 → 20 → 0 (c=8)
2677889 → 338688 → 27648 → 2688 → 768 → 336 → 54 → 20 → 0 (c=9)
26888999 → 4478976 → 338688 → 27648 → 2688 → 768 → 336 → 54 → 20 → 0 (c=10)
3778888999 → 438939648 → 4478976 → 338688 → 27648 → 2688 → 768 → 336 → 54 → 20 → 0 (c=11)
277777788888899 → 4996238671872 → 438939648 → 4478976 → 338688 → 27648 → 2688 → 768 → 336 → 54 → 20 → 0 (c=12)


Base 11

26 → 11 → 1 in b11 (c=3) (n=28 in b10)
3A → 28 → 15 → 5 in b11 (c=4) (n=43 in b10)
69 → 4A → 37 → 1A → A in b11 (c=5) (n=75 in b10)
269 → 99 → 74 → 26 → 11 → 1 in b11 (c=6) (n=317 in b10)
3579 → 78A → 46A → 1A9 → 82 → 15 → 5 in b11 (c=7) (n=4684 in b10)
26778 → 3597 → 78A → 46A → 1A9 → 82 → 15 → 5 in b11 (c=8) (n=38200 in b10)
47788A → 86277 → 3597 → 78A → 46A → 1A9 → 82 → 15 → 5 in b11 (c=9) (n=757074 in b10)
67899AAA → 143A9869 → 299596 → 2A954 → 2783 → 286 → 88 → 59 → 41 → 4 in b11 (c=10) (n=130757439 in b10)
77777889999 → 2AA174996A → 143A9869 → 299596 → 2A954 → 2783 → 286 → 88 → 59 → 41 → 4 in b11 (c=11) (n=199718348047 in b10)


Base 12

26 → 10 → 0 in b12 (c=3) (n=30 in b10)
3A → 26 → 10 → 0 in b12 (c=4) (n=46 in b10)
6B → 56 → 26 → 10 → 0 in b12 (c=5) (n=83 in b10)
777 → 247 → 48 → 28 → 14 → 4 in b12 (c=6) (n=1099 in b10)
AAB → 778 → 288 → A8 → 68 → 40 → 0 in b12 (c=7) (n=1571 in b10)
3577777799 → 3BA55B53 → 557916 → 5576 → 736 → A6 → 50 → 0 in b12 (c=8) (n=17902874277 in b10)


Base 13

27 → 11 → 1 in b13 (c=3) (n=33 in b10)
3B → 27 → 11 → 1 in b13 (c=4) (n=50 in b10)
5A → 3B → 27 → 11 → 1 in b13 (c=5) (n=75 in b10)
9A → 6C → 57 → 29 → 15 → 5 in b13 (c=6) (n=127 in b10)
27A → AA → 79 → 4B → 35 → 12 → 2 in b13 (c=7) (n=439 in b10)
8AC → 58B → 27B → BB → 94 → 2A → 17 → 7 in b13 (c=8) (n=1494 in b10)
35AB → 99C → 59A → 288 → 9B → 78 → 44 → 13 → 3 in b13 (c=9) (n=7577 in b10)
9BBB → 55B6 → 99C → 59A → 288 → 9B → 78 → 44 → 13 → 3 in b13 (c=10) (n=21786 in b10)
2999BBC → 591795 → 65B5 → 99C → 59A → 288 → 9B → 78 → 44 → 13 → 3 in b13 (c=11) (n=13274091 in b10)
28CCCCCC → 9B89B93 → 591795 → 65B5 → 99C → 59A → 288 → 9B → 78 → 44 → 13 → 3 in b13 (c=12) (n=168938314 in b10)
377AAAABCCC → 2833B38BCB → B588A8A → 777995 → 4B2CA → 4A64 → 58B → 27B → BB → 94 → 2A → 17 → 7 in b13 (c=13) (n=494196864368 in b10)


Base 14

27 → 10 → 0 in b14 (c=3) (n=35 in b10)
3C → 28 → 12 → 2 in b14 (c=4) (n=54 in b10)
5B → 3D → 2B → 18 → 8 in b14 (c=5) (n=81 in b10)
99 → 5B → 3D → 2B → 18 → 8 in b14 (c=6) (n=135 in b10)
359 → 99 → 5B → 3D → 2B → 18 → 8 in b14 (c=7) (n=667 in b10)
CCC → 8B6 → 29A → CC → A4 → 2C → 1A → A in b14 (c=8) (n=2532 in b10)
359AB → 55AA → CA8 → 4C8 → 1D6 → 58 → 2C → 1A → A in b14 (c=9) (n=130883 in b10)
CDDDD → 8CC8C → 2C436 → 8B6 → 29A → CC → A4 → 2C → 1A → A in b14 (c=10) (n=499407 in b10)
3ABBDDDD → DAAAD54 → 63DAC8 → 5BC1A → 2596 → 2A8 → B6 → 4A → 2C → 1A → A in b14 (c=11) (n=397912927 in b10)
488AABCCCDDD → 39A59889584 → A89DBD84 → 598D14C → 5BC1A → 2596 → 2A8 → B6 → 4A → 2C → 1A → A in b14 (c=12) (n=18693488093783 in b10)


Base 15

28 → 11 → 1 in b15 (c=3) (n=38 in b10)
3D → 29 → 13 → 3 in b15 (c=4) (n=58 in b10)
5E → 4A → 2A → 15 → 5 in b15 (c=5) (n=89 in b10)
28C → CC → 99 → 56 → 20 → 0 in b15 (c=6) (n=582 in b10)
8AE → 4EA → 275 → 4A → 2A → 15 → 5 in b15 (c=7) (n=1964 in b10)
5BBB → 1E8A → 4EA → 275 → 4A → 2A → 15 → 5 in b15 (c=8) (n=19526 in b10)
BBBCC → 3BBC9 → B939 → BD3 → 1D9 → 7C → 59 → 30 → 0 in b15 (c=9) (n=596667 in b10)
2999BDE → 3C9CE6 → 66B7C → 9CC9 → 36C9 → 899 → 2D3 → 53 → 10 → 0 in b15 (c=10) (n=30104309 in b10)
39BBCCCCCD → 41CBD6D4C → 23C96E6 → 66B7C → 9CC9 → 36C9 → 899 → 2D3 → 53 → 10 → 0 in b15 (c=11) (n=140410607143 in b10)


Base 16

28 → 10 → 0 in b16 (c=3) (n=40 in b10)
3E → 2A → 14 → 4 in b16 (c=4) (n=62 in b10)
5F → 4B → 2C → 18 → 8 in b16 (c=5) (n=95 in b10)
BB → 79 → 3F → 2D → 1A → A in b16 (c=6) (n=187 in b10)
2AB → DC → 9C → 6C → 48 → 20 → 0 in b16 (c=7) (n=683 in b10)
3DDE → 1BBA → 4BA → 1B8 → 58 → 28 → 10 → 0 in b16 (c=8) (n=15838 in b10)
379BDD → 55C77 → 396C → 798 → 1F8 → 78 → 38 → 18 → 8 in b16 (c=9) (n=3644381 in b10)


Base 17

29 → 11 → 1 in b17 (c=3) (n=43 in b10)
3F → 2B → 15 → 5 in b17 (c=4) (n=66 in b10)
5G → 4C → 2E → 1B → B in b17 (c=5) (n=101 in b10)
9F → 7G → 6A → 39 → 1A → A in b17 (c=6) (n=168 in b10)
CE → 9F → 7G → 6A → 39 → 1A → A in b17 (c=7) (n=218 in b10)
3DD → 1CE → 9F → 7G → 6A → 39 → 1A → A in b17 (c=8) (n=1101 in b10)
9CF → 5A5 → EC → 9F → 7G → 6A → 39 → 1A → A in b17 (c=9) (n=2820 in b10)
2AFF → F9C → 5A5 → EC → 9F → 7G → 6A → 39 → 1A → A in b17 (c=10) (n=12986 in b10)
55DDF → CF4G → 25EB → 55A → EC → 9F → 7G → 6A → 39 → 1A → A in b17 (c=11) (n=446163 in b10)
39DDGG → DGCG7 → 35F54 → F9C → 5A5 → EC → 9F → 7G → 6A → 39 → 1A → A in b17 (c=12) (n=5079174 in b10)
DEGGGG → 86DCDC → DGCG7 → 35F54 → F9C → 5A5 → EC → 9F → 7G → 6A → 39 → 1A → A in b17 (c=13) (n=19710955 in b10)
6BBBBBEEF → 6FBEB7G8 → 5B39ACE → 1CED8G → 35F54 → F9C → 5A5 → EC → 9F → 7G → 6A → 39 → 1A → A in b17 (c=14) (n=46650378808 in b10)
2BDDDDDEEEEEF → 1FBBBB76B714 → 6FBEB7G8 → 5B39ACE → 1CED8G → 35F54 → F9C → 5A5 → EC → 9F → 7G → 6A → 39 → 1A → A in b17 (c=15) (n=1570081251102035 in b10)


Base 18

29 → 10 → 0 in b18 (c=3) (n=45 in b10)
3F → 29 → 10 → 0 in b18 (c=4) (n=69 in b10)
5E → 3G → 2C → 16 → 6 in b18 (c=5) (n=104 in b10)
8D → 5E → 3G → 2C → 16 → 6 in b18 (c=6) (n=157 in b10)
2BB → D8 → 5E → 3G → 2C → 16 → 6 in b18 (c=7) (n=857 in b10)
2CEG → GAC → 5GC → 2H6 → B6 → 3C → 20 → 0 in b18 (c=8) (n=15820 in b10)
AABF → 2EGC → GAC → 5GC → 2H6 → B6 → 3C → 20 → 0 in b18 (c=9) (n=61773 in b10)
8GGHH → 5B8DE → DD2G → GC8 → 4D6 → H6 → 5C → 36 → 10 → 0 in b18 (c=10) (n=938627 in b10)
AAAAAAH → 8HGH28 → 5B8DE → DD2G → GC8 → 4D6 → H6 → 5C → 36 → 10 → 0 in b18 (c=11) (n=360129437 in b10)


Base 19

2A → 11 → 1 in b19 (c=3) (n=48 in b10)
3G → 2A → 11 → 1 in b19 (c=4) (n=73 in b10)
5F → 3I → 2G → 1D → D in b19 (c=5) (n=110 in b10)
AB → 5F → 3I → 2G → 1D → D in b19 (c=6) (n=201 in b10)
DH → BC → 6I → 5D → 38 → 15 → 5 in b19 (c=7) (n=264 in b10)
2BC → DH → BC → 6I → 5D → 38 → 15 → 5 in b19 (c=8) (n=943 in b10)
7BG → 37G → HD → BC → 6I → 5D → 38 → 15 → 5 in b19 (c=9) (n=2752 in b10)
DII → BCD → 4E6 → HD → BC → 6I → 5D → 38 → 15 → 5 in b19 (c=10) (n=5053 in b10)
4AAH → IFH → CDB → 4E6 → HD → BC → 6I → 5D → 38 → 15 → 5 in b19 (c=11) (n=31253 in b10)
3BGII → 15HGF → 2I9D → BCD → 4E6 → HD → BC → 6I → 5D → 38 → 15 → 5 in b19 (c=12) (n=472548 in b10)
EEFHH → 69GBI → 15HGF → 2I9D → BCD → 4E6 → HD → BC → 6I → 5D → 38 → 15 → 5 in b19 (c=13) (n=1926275 in b10)
ADEFFH → 2F7HHE → 69GBI → 15HGF → 2I9D → BCD → 4E6 → HD → BC → 6I → 5D → 38 → 15 → 5 in b19 (c=14) (n=26556906 in b10)
4ADDDDEEF → 3E7919IH → 2HH7FE → 69GBI → 15HGF → 2I9D → BCD → 4E6 → HD → BC → 6I → 5D → 38 → 15 → 5 in b19 (c=15) (n=77518543969 in b10)
9999999BBFHHHI → 6B41DG4CB3BG → H27A5F3D → 2F7HHE → 69GBI → 15HGF → 2I9D → BCD → 4E6 → HD → BC → 6I → 5D → 38 → 15 → 5 in b19 (c=16) (n=399503342991325867 in b10)


Base 20

2A → 10 → 0 in b20 (c=3) (n=50 in b10)
3H → 2B → 12 → 2 in b20 (c=4) (n=77 in b10)
6D → 3I → 2E → 18 → 8 in b20 (c=5) (n=133 in b10)
7J → 6D → 3I → 2E → 18 → 8 in b20 (c=6) (n=159 in b10)
DI → BE → 7E → 4I → 3C → 1G → G in b20 (c=7) (n=278 in b10)
6DE → 2EC → GG → CG → 9C → 58 → 20 → 0 in b20 (c=8) (n=2674 in b10)
CGG → 7DC → 2EC → GG → CG → 9C → 58 → 20 → 0 in b20 (c=9) (n=5136 in b10)
2BHI → GGC → 7DC → 2EC → GG → CG → 9C → 58 → 20 → 0 in b20 (c=10) (n=20758 in b10)
CDGG → 4JGG → 28CG → 7DC → 2EC → GG → CG → 9C → 58 → 20 → 0 in b20 (c=11) (n=101536 in b10)
2DEGJ → DGCG → 4JGG → 28CG → 7DC → 2EC → GG → CG → 9C → 58 → 20 → 0 in b20 (c=12) (n=429939 in b10)
77BBHJ → BJ7D7 → GCGD → 4JGG → 28CG → 7DC → 2EC → GG → CG → 9C → 58 → 20 → 0 in b20 (c=13) (n=23612759 in b10)
BBBCEEHHHHH → 8DCB4G21J4 → 21ED4J4 → DGCG → 4JGG → 28CG → 7DC → 2EC → GG → CG → 9C → 58 → 20 → 0 in b20 (c=14) (n=118569903663157 in b10)


Base 21

2B → 11 → 1 in b21 (c=3) (n=53 in b10)
3I → 2C → 13 → 3 in b21 (c=4) (n=81 in b10)
6H → 4I → 39 → 16 → 6 in b21 (c=5) (n=143 in b10)
AK → 9B → 4F → 2I → 1F → F in b21 (c=6) (n=230 in b10)
GH → CK → B9 → 4F → 2I → 1F → F in b21 (c=7) (n=353 in b10)
4GI → 2CI → KC → B9 → 4F → 2I → 1F → F in b21 (c=8) (n=2118 in b10)
GII → BFI → 6F9 → 1HC → 9F → 69 → 2C → 13 → 3 in b21 (c=9) (n=7452 in b10)
5FHJ → 2CJC → C8C → 2CI → KC → B9 → 4F → 2I → 1F → F in b21 (c=10) (n=53296 in b10)
2BGIJ → CKKC → 64CI → BFI → 6F9 → 1HC → 9F → 69 → 2C → 13 → 3 in b21 (c=11) (n=498286 in b10)
FHKKK → AA5HI → GAJF → 4J89 → C8C → 2CI → KC → B9 → 4F → 2I → 1F → F in b21 (c=12) (n=3083912 in b10)
3BDGHJK → AHKKA3 → AA5HI → GAJF → 4J89 → C8C → 2CI → KC → B9 → 4F → 2I → 1F → F in b21 (c=13) (n=304907819 in b10)
6BBHIJJJJ → G1BHJ4DF → AHKKA3 → AA5HI → GAJF → 4J89 → C8C → 2CI → KC → B9 → 4F → 2I → 1F → F in b21 (c=14) (n=247765672579 in b10)
3DDGGGGGGGIIJ → 284GJDKAD63I → 5D65FHGK3 → 5BIB3KC → 1J6DC9 → H5JF → 2CJC → C8C → 2CI → KC → B9 → 4F → 2I → 1F → F in b21 (c=15) (n=26851272398708896 in b10)

Primal Pellicles

Numbers have thin skins. And they’re easily replaced. Take 71624133. Here it is permuting its pellicles:

71624133 in base 10 = 100010001001110010111000101 in base 2 = 11222202212211200 in b3 = 10101032113011 in b4 = 121313433013 in b5 = 11035053113 in b6 = 1526536500 in b7 = 421162705 in b8 = 158685750 in b9 = 374802A9 in b11 = 1BBA1199 in b12 = 11AB9B59 in b13 = 9726137 in b14 = 644BE73 in b15 = F3855B7 in b16

But if digits are the skin of 71624133, what are its bones? Well, you could say the skeleton of a number, something that doesn’t change from base to base, is its prime factorization:

71624133 = 32 × 72 × 162413

But the primes themselves are numbers, so they’re wearing pellicles too. And it turns out that, in base 10, the pellicles of the prime factors of 71624133 match the pellicle of 71624133 itself:

71624133 = 32.72.162413

Here’s a list of primal pellicles in base 10:

735 = 3.5.72
3792 = 24.3.79
1341275 = 52.13.4127
13115375 = 53.7.13.1153
22940075 = 52.229.4007
29373375 = 3.53.29.37.73
71624133 = 32.72.162413
311997175 = 52.7.172.31.199
319953792 = 27.3.53.79.199
1019127375 = 32.53.7.127.1019
1147983375 = 3.53.7.11.83.479
1734009275 = 52.173.400927
5581625072 = 24.5581.62507
7350032375 = 53.7.23.73.5003
17370159615 = 34.5.17.59.61.701
33061224492 = 22.33.306122449
103375535837 = 72.37.103.553583
171167303912 = 23.11.172.6730391
319383665913 = 3.133.19.383.6659
533671737975 = 34.52.17.53.367.797
2118067737975 = 32.52.7.79.211.80677
3111368374257 = 3.112.132.683.74257
3216177757191 = 3.73.191.757.21617
3740437158475 = 52.37.4043715847
3977292332775 = 3.52.292.233.277.977
4417149692375 = 53.7.23.4969.44171
7459655393232 = 24.32.72.23.45965539
7699132721175 = 3.52.72.27211.76991
7973529228735 = 3.5.7.972.2287.3529
10771673522535 = 34.5.67.71.107.52253

You can find them at the Online Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences under A121342, “Composite numbers that are a concatenation of their distinct prime divisors in some order.” But what about pairs of primal pellicles, that is, pairs of numbers where the prime factors of each form the pellicle of the other?

35 = 5.775 = 3.52
1275 = 3.52.173175 = 52.127
131715 = 32.5.2927329275 = 52.13171
3199767 = 3.359.297135932971 = 3.19.67.972
14931092 = 22.11.61.5563116155632 = 24.3.109.1492

And here are a few primal pellicles I’ve found in other bases:

Primal Pellicles in Base 2

1111011011110 = 10.1110.110110111 in b2 = 7902 = 2.32.439 in b10
1110001100110111 = 1110.10111.100011001 in b2 = 58167 = 32.23.281 in b10
1111011011011110 = 10.1110.110110110111 in b2 = 63198 = 2.32.3511 in b10
11101001100001101 = 1110.101.101001100001 in b2 = 119565 = 32.5.2657 in b10
1111011011011011110 = 10.1110.110110110110111 in b2 = 505566 = 2.32.28087 in b10
1111011111101111011 = 1110.1011.10111.11011111 in b2 = 507771 = 32.11.23.223 in b10


Primal Pellicles in Base 3

121022 = 210.12.102 in b3 = 440 = 23.5.11 in b10
212212 = 22.21.212 in b3 = 644 = 22.7.23 in b10
20110112 = 210.201.1011 in b3 = 4712 = 23.19.31 in b10
21110110 = 10.212.1101 in b3 = 5439 = 3.72.37 in b10
121111101 = 122.111.1101 in b3 = 12025 = 52.13.37 in b10
222112121 = 22.21.221121 in b3 = 19348 = 22.7.691 in b10
2202122021 = 22.2021.22021 in b3 = 54412 = 22.61.223 in b10
120212201221 = 2.122.21.201.1202 in b3 = 312550 = 2.52.7.19.47 in b10


Primal Pellicles in Base 7

2525 = 2.52.25 in b7 = 950 = 2.52.19 in b10
3210 = 2.34.10 in b7 = 1134 = 2.34.7 in b10
5252 = 2.52.52 in b7 = 1850 = 2.52.37 in b10
332616 = 33.16.326 in b7 = 58617 = 33.13.167 in b10
336045 = 32.5.3604 in b7 = 59715 = 32.5.1327 in b10
2251635 = 22.3.5.16.252 in b7 = 281580 = 22.3.5.13.192 in b10


Primal Pellicles in Base 11

253 = 22.3.52 in b11 = 300 = 22.3.52 in b10
732 = 2.32.72 in b11 = 882 = 2.32.72 in b10
2123 = 23.33.12 in b11 = 2808 = 23.33.13 in b10
3432 = 25.3.43 in b11 = 4512 = 25.3.47 in b10
3710 = 32.72.10 in b11 = 4851 = 32.72.11 in b10
72252 = 23.72.225 in b11 = 105448 = 23.72.269 in b10


Primal Pellicles in Base 15

275 = 24.5.7 in b15 = 560 = 24.5.7 in b10
2D5 = 2.52.D in b15 = 650 = 2.52.13 in b10
2CD5 = 2.52.CD in b15 = 9650 = 2.52.193 in b10
7BE3 = 3.72.BE in b15 = 26313 = 3.72.179 in b10
21285 = 24.52.128 in b15 = 105200 = 24.52.263 in b10

Summer-Time Twos

I wondered how often the digits of n2 appeared in sum(n1,n2). For example:

17 → 117 = sum(9,17)
20200 = sum(5,20); 204,4; 207,3; 209,2 (c=4)

As I looked at higher n2, I found that the 2-views continued:

63 → 363 = sum(58,63); 638,53; 1638,28; 1763,23; 1863,18 (c=5)
88 → 1288 = sum(73,88); 2788,48; 2881,46; 3388,33; 3880,9; 3888,8 (c=6)
20020009 = sum(14,200); 20022,13; 20034,12; 20045,11; 20055,10; 20064,9;
200
72,8; 20079,7; 20085,6; 20090,5; 20094,4; 20097,3; 20099,2 (c=13)
558 → 39558 = sum(483,558); 55833,448; 95583,348; 105558,318; 125580,247; 126558,243; 143558,158; 152558,83; 155583,28; 155808,18; 155825,17; 155841,16; 155856,15; 155870,14; 155883,13; 155895,12 (c=16)
20002000010 = sum(45,2000); 2000054,44; 2000097,43; 2000139,42; 2000180,41; 2000220,40; 2000259,39; 2000297,38; 2000334,37; 2000370,36; 2000405,35; 2000439,34; 2000472,33; 2000504,32; 2000535,31; 2000565,30;
2000594,29; 2000622,28; 2000649,27; 2000675,26; 2000700,25; 2000724,24; 2000747,23; 2000769,22; 2000790,21; 2000810,20; 2000829,19; 2000847,18; 2000864,17; 2000880,16; 2000895,15; 2000909,14; 2000922,13; 2000934,
12; 2000945,11; 2000955,10; 2000964,9; 2000972,8; 2000979,7; 2000985,6; 2000990,5; 2000994,4; 2000997,3; 2000999,2 (c=44)

But what about other bases?

Base 9

15 in b9 → 115 = sum(5,15) (n=14 in b10) (c=1)
18 in b9 → 118 = sum(11,17); 180,1 (n=17 in b10) (c=2)
20 in b9 → 203 = sum(4,18); 206,3; 208,2 (n=18 in b10) (c=3)
45 in b9 → 445 = sum(32,41); 745,25; 1045,15; 1145,5 (n=41 in b10) (c=4)
55 in b9 → 555 = sum(41,50); 1055,35; 1355,25; 1555,15; 1655,5 (n=50 in b10) (c=5)
65 in b9 → 665 = sum(50,59); 1265,45; 1665,35; 2065,25; 2265,15; 2365,5 (n=59 in b10) (c=6)
75 in b9 → 775 = sum(59,68); 1475,55; 2075,45; 2475,35; 2750,26; 2775,25; 3075,15; 3175,5 (n=68 in b10) (c=8)
85 in b9 → 885 = sum(68,77); 1685,65; 2385,55; 2885,45; 3385,35; 3685,25; 3853,17; 3885,15; 4085,5 (n=77 in b10) (c=9)
200 in b9 → 20003 = sum(13,162); 20016,13; 20028,12; 20040,11; 20050,10; 20058,8; 20066,7; 20073,6; 20078,5; 20083,4; 20086,3; 20088,2 (n=162 in b10) (c=12)
415 in b9 → 13415 = sum(311,338); 25415,345; 36415,315; 41525,302; 46415,275; 55415,245; 63415,215; 64155,212; 70415,175; 75415,145; 80415,115; 83415,75; 85415,45; 86415,15 (n=338 in b10) (c=14)
[…]
2000 in b9 → 2000028 = sum(38,1458); 2000070,41; 2000120,40; 2000158,38; 2000206,37; 2000243,36; 2000278,35; 2000323,34; 2000356,33; 2000388,32; 2000430,31; 2000460,30; 2000488,28; 2000526,27; 2000553,26; 2000578,25; 2000613,24; 2000636,23; 2000658,22; 2000680,21; 2000710,20; 2000728,18; 2000746,17; 2000763,16; 2000778,15; 2000803,14; 2000816,13; 2000828,12; 2000840,11; 2000850,10; 2000858,8; 2000866,7; 2000873,6; 2000878,5; 2000883,4; 2000886,3; 2000888,2 (n=1458 in b10) (c=37)


Base 11

16 in b11 → 116 = sum(6,16) (n=17 in b10) (c=1)
20 in b11 → 201 = sum(5,22); 205,4; 208,3; 20A,2 (n=22 in b10) (c=4)
56 in b11 → 556 = sum(50,61); 956,36; 1156,26; 1356,16; 1456,6 (n=61 in b10) (c=5)
66 in b11 → 666 = sum(61,72); 1066,46; 1466,36; 1669,2A; 1766,26; 1966,16; 1A66,6 (n=72 in b10) (c=7)
86 in b11 → 886 = sum(83,94); 1486,66; 1A86,56; 2486,46; 2886,36; 3086,26; 3286,16; 3386,6 (n=94 in b10) (c=8)
96 in b11 → 996 = sum(94,105); 1696,76; 2296,66; 2896,56; 3296,46; 3696,36; 3996,26; 4096,16; 4196,6 (n=105 in b10) (c=9)
A6 in b11 → AA6 = sum(105,116); 18A6,86; 25A6,76; 31A6,66; 37A6,56; 41A6,46; 45A6,36; 48A6,26; 4AA6,16; 50A6,6 (n=116 in b10) (c=10)
200 in b11 → 1200A = sum(156,242); 20001,15; 20015,14; 20028,13; 2003A,12; 20050,11; 20060,10; 2006A,A; 20078,9; 20085,8; 20091,7; 20097,6; 200A1,5; 200A5,4; 200A8,3; 200AA,2 (n=242 in b10) (c=16)
[…]
A66 in b11 → 1AA66 = sum(1260,1282); A1A66,966; 109A66,946; 182A66,866; 198A66,846; 23A666,786; 253A66,766; 267A66,746; 314A66,666; 326A66,646; 375A66,566; 385A66,546; 416A66,466; 424A66,446; 457A66,366; 463A66,346; 46A666,326; 488A66,266; 492A66,246; 4A6666,186; 4A9A66,166; 501A66,146; 50AA66,66; 510A66,46 (n=1282 in b10) (c=24)
2000 in b11 → 2000005 = sum(52,2662); 2000051,47; 2000097,46; 2000131,45; 2000175,44; 2000208,43; 200024A,42; 2000290,41; 2000320,40; 200035A,3A; 2000398,39; 2000425,38; 2000461,37; 2000497,36; 2000521,35; 2000555,34; 2000588,33; 200060A,32; 2000640,31; 2000670,30; 200069A,2A; 2000718,29; 2000745,28; 2000771,27; 2000797,26; 2000811,25; 2000835,24; 2000858,23; 200087A,22; 20008A0,21; 2000910,20; 200092A,1A; 2000948,19; 2000965,18; 2000981,17; 2000997,16; 2000A01,15; 2000A15,14; 2000A28,13; 2000A3A,12; 2000A50,11; 2000A60,10; 2000A6A,A; 2000A78,9; 2000A85,8; 2000A91,7; 2000A97,6; 2000AA1,5; 2000AA5,4; 2000AA8,3; 2000AAA,2 (n=2662 in b10) (c=51)


Base 3

12 in b3 → 112 = sum(2,12); 120,1 (n=5 in b10) (c=2)
20 in b3 → 120 = sum(4,6); 200,10; 202,2 (n=6 in b10) (c=3)
122 in b3 → 10122 = sum(11,17); 11122,22; 11220,21; 12122,2; 12200,1 (n=17 in b10) (c=5)
1212 in b3 → 121212 = sum(41,50); 1001212,1012; 1101212,212; 1112120,200; 1121212,112; 1201212,12 (n=50 in b10) (c=6)
1222 in b3 → 122222 = sum(44,53); 1101222,1002; 1111222,222; 1112220,221; 1212222,102; 1221222,2; 1222000,1 (n=53 in b10) (c=7)
2000 in b3 → 1112000 = sum(28,54); 1120000,1000; 2000020,21; 2000110,20; 2000122,12; 2000210,11; 2000220,10; 2000222,2 (n=54 in b10) (c=8)
[…]
20000 in b3 → 111120000 = sum(82,162); 111200000,10000; 200000010,111; 200000120,110; 200000222,102; 200001100,101; 200001200,100; 200001222,22; 200002020,21; 200002110,20; 200002122,12; 200002210,11; 200002220,10; 200002222,2 (n=162 in b10) (c=14)


Base 4

13 in b4 → 130 = sum(1,13) (n=7 in b10) (c=1)
20 in b4 → 201 = sum(3,8); 203,2 (n=8 in b10) (c=2)
200 in b4 → 20001 = sum(6,32); 20012,11; 20022,10; 20031,3; 20033,2 (n=32 in b10) (c=5)
2000 in b4 → 2000021 = sum(11,128); 2000103,22; 2000130,21; 2000210,20; 2000223,13; 2000301,12; 2000312,11; 2000322,10; 2000331,3; 2000333,2 (n=128 in b10) (c=10)
20000 in b4 → 200000003 = sum(23,512); 200000121,112; 200000232,111; 200001002,110; 200001111,103; 200001213,102; 200001320,101; 200002020,100; 200002113,33; 200002211,32; 200002302,31; 200002332,30; 200003021,23; 200003103,22; 200003130,21; 200003210,20; 200003223,13; 200003301,12; 200003312,11; 200003322,10; 200003331,3; 200003333,2 (n=512 in b10) (c=22)


Base 8

17 in b8 → 170 = sum(1,17) (n=15 in b10) (c=1)
20 in b8 → 202 = sum(4,16); 205,3; 207,2 (n=16 in b10) (c=3)
200 in b8 → 20011 = sum(11,128); 20023,12; 20034,11; 20044,10; 20053,7; 20061,6; 20066,5; 20072,4; 20075,3; 20077,2 (n=128 in b10) (c=10)
2000 in b8 → 2000020 = sum(32,1024); 2000057,37; 2000115,36; 2000152,35; 2000206,34; 2000241,33; 2000273,32; 2000324,31; 2000354,30; 2000403,27; 2000431,26; 2000456,25; 2000502,24; 2000525,23; 2000547,22; 200057
0,21; 2000610,20; 2000627,17; 2000645,16; 2000662,15; 2000676,14; 2000711,13; 2000723,12; 2000734,11; 2000744,10; 2000753,7; 2000761,6; 2000766,5; 2000772,4; 2000775,3; 2000777,2 (n=1024 in b10) (c=31)


Base 16

1F in b16 → 1F0 = sum(1,1F) (n=31 in b10) (c=1)
20 in b16 → 201 = sum(6,32); 206,5; 20A,4; 20D,3; 20F,2 (n=32 in b10) (c=5)
200 in b16 → 20003 = sum(23,512); 20019,16; 2002E,15; 20042,14; 20055,13; 20067,12; 20078,11; 20088,10; 20097,F; 200A5,E; 200B2,D; 200BE,C; 200C9,B; 200D3,A; 200DC,9; 200E4,8; 200EB,7; 200F1,6; 20
0
F6,5; 200FA,4; 200FD,3; 200FF,2 (n=512 in b10) (c=22)
[…]
EE4 in b16 → 42EE4A = sum(961,EE4); 6EE413,16; 6EE428,15; 6EE43C,14; 6EE44F,13; 6EE461,12; 6EE472,11; 6EE482,10; 6EE491,F; 6EE49F,E; 6EE4AC,D; 6EE4B8,C; 6EE4C3,B; 6EE4CD,A; 6EE4D6,9; 6EE4DE,8; 6EE4E5,7; 6EE4EB,6; 6EE4F0,5; 6EE4F4,4; 6EE4F7,3; 6EE4F9,2; 6EE4FA,1 (n=3812 in b10) (c=23)
2000 in b16 → 2000001 = sum(5B,2000); 200005B,5A; 20000B4,59; 200010C,58; 2000163,57; 20001B9,56; 200020E,55; 2000262,54; 20002B5,53; 2000307,52; 2000358,51; 20003A8,50; 20003F7,4F; 2000445,4E; 2000492,4D; 20004DE,4C; 2000529,4B; 2000573,4A; 20005BC,49; 2000604,48; 200064B,47; 2000691,46; 20006D6,45; 200071A,44; 200075D,43; 200079F,42; 20007E0,41; 2000820,40; 200085F,3F; 200089D,3E; 20008DA,3D; 2000916,3C; 2000951,3B; 200098B,3A; 20009C4,39; 20009FC,38; 2000A33,37; 2000A69,36; 2000A9E,35; 2000AD2,34; 2000B05,33; 2000B37,32; 2000B68,31; 2000B98,30; 2000BC7,2F; 2000BF5,2E; 2000C22,2D; 2000C4E,2C; 2000C79,2B; 2000CA3,2A; 2000CCC,29; 2000CF4,28; 2000D1B,27; 2000D41,26; 2000D66,25; 2000D8A,24; 2000DAD,23; 2000DCF,22; 2000DF0,21; 2000E10,20; 2000E2F,1F; 2000E4D,1E; 2000E6A,1D; 2000E86,1C; 2000EA1,1B; 2000EBB,1A; 2000ED4,19; 2000EEC,18; 2000F03,17; 2000F19,16; 2000F2E,15; 2000F42,14; 2000F55,13; 2000F67,12; 2000F78,11; 2000F88,10; 2000F97,F; 2000FA5,E; 2000FB2,D; 2000FBE,C; 2000FC9,B; 2000FD3,A; 2000FDC,9; 2000FE4,8; 2000FEB,7; 2000FF1,6; 2000FF6,5; 2000FFA,4; 2000FFD,3; 2000FFF,2 (n=8192 in b10) (c=90)


Previously Pre-Posted (Please Peruse)

Summer-Time Hues
Summer-Climb Views
Summult-Time Hues

Feral Fractions

“The uniquely unrepresentative ‘Egyptian’ fraction.” That’s what David Wells calls 2/3 = 0·666… in The Penguin Dictionary of Curious and Interesting Numbers (1986). Why unrepresentative”? Wells goes on to explain: “the Egyptians used only unit fractions, with this one exception. All other fractional quantities were expressed as sums of unit fractions.”

A unit fraction is 1 divided by a higher integer: 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, 1/5 and so on. Modern mathematicians are interested in those sums of unit fractions that produce integers, like this:

1 = 1/2 + 1/3 + 1/6 = egypt(2,3,6)
1 = 1/2 + 1/4 + 1/6 + 1/12 = egypt(2,4,6,12)
1 = 1/2 + 1/3 + 1/10 + 1/15 = egypt(2,3,10,15)
1 = egypt(2,4,10,12,15)
1 = egypt(3,4,6,10,12,15)
1 = egypt(2,3,9,18)
1 = egypt(2,4,9,12,18)
1 = egypt(3,4,6,9,12,18)
1 = egypt(2,6,9,10,15,18)
1 = egypt(3,4,9,10,12,15,18)
1 = egypt(2,4,5,20)
1 = egypt(3,4,5,6,20)
1 = egypt(2,5,6,12,20)
1 = egypt(3,4,5,10,15,20)
1 = egypt(2,5,10,12,15,20)
1 = egypt(3,5,6,10,12,15,20)
1 = egypt(3,4,5,9,18,20)
1 = egypt(2,5,9,12,18,20)
1 = egypt(3,5,6,9,12,18,20)
1 = egypt(4,5,6,9,10,15,18,20)

2 = egypt(2,3,4,5,6,8,9,10,15,18,20,24)
2 = 1/2 + 1/3 + 1/4 + 1/5 + 1/6 + 1/8 + 1/9 + 1/10 + 1/15 + 1/18 + 1/20 + 1/24


Sums-to-integers like those are called Egyptian fractions, for short. I looked for some such sums that included 1/666:

1 = egypt(2,3,7,63,222,518,666)
1 = egypt(2,3,8,36,111,296,666)
1 = egypt(2,3,9,20,444,555,666)
1 = egypt(2,3,9,21,222,518,666)
1 = egypt(2,3,9,24,111,296,666)
1 = egypt(2,3,9,26,74,481,666)
1 = egypt(2,4,8,9,111,296,666)


And I looked for Egyptian fractions whose denominators summed to rep-digits like 111 and 666 (denominators are the bit below the stroke of 1/3 or 2/3, where the bit above is called the numerator):

1 = egypt(4,6,7,9,10,14,15,18,28)
111 = 4+6+7+9+10+14+15+18+28


1 = egypt(3,6,8,9,10,15,21,24,126)
222 = 3+6+8+9+10+15+21+24+126


1 = egypt(2,6,8,12,16,17,272)
333 = 2+6+8+12+16+17+272


1 = egypt(2,4,9,11,22,396)
444 = 2+4+9+11+22+396


1 = egypt(5,6,9,10,11,12,15,20,21,22,28,396)
555 = 5+6+9+10+11+12+15+20+21+22+28+396


1 = egypt(2,6,8,10,15,25,600)
666 = 2+6+8+10+15+25+600


1 = egypt(4,5,8,12,14,18,20,21,24,26,28,819)
999 = 4+5+8+12+14+18+20+21+24+26+28+819


Alas, Egyptian fractions like those are attractive but trivial. This isn’t trivial, though:

Prof Greg Martin of the University of British Columbia has found a remarkable Egyptian fraction for 1 with 454 denominators all less than 1000.

1 = egypt(97, 103, 109, 113, 127, 131, 137, 190, 192, 194, 195, 196, 198, 200, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 225, 228, 230, 231, 234, 235, 238, 240, 244, 245, 248, 252, 253, 254, 255, 256, 259, 264, 265, 266, 267, 268, 272, 273, 274, 275, 279, 280, 282, 284, 285, 286, 287, 290, 291, 294, 295, 296, 299, 300, 301, 303, 304, 306, 308, 309, 312, 315, 319, 320, 321, 322, 323, 327, 328, 329, 330, 332, 333, 335, 338, 339, 341, 342, 344, 345, 348, 351, 352, 354, 357, 360, 363, 364, 365, 366, 369, 370, 371, 372, 374, 376, 377, 378, 380, 385, 387, 390, 391, 392, 395, 396, 399, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 408, 410, 411, 412, 414, 415, 416, 418, 420, 423, 424, 425, 426, 427, 428, 429, 430, 432, 434, 435, 437, 438, 440, 442, 445, 448, 450, 451, 452, 455, 456, 459, 460, 462, 464, 465, 468, 469, 470, 472, 473, 474, 475, 476, 477, 480, 481, 483, 484, 485, 486, 488, 490, 492, 493, 494, 495, 496, 497, 498, 504, 505, 506, 507, 508, 510, 511, 513, 515, 516, 517, 520, 522, 524, 525, 527, 528, 530, 531, 532, 533, 536, 539, 540, 546, 548, 549, 550, 551, 552, 553, 555, 558, 559, 560, 561, 564, 567, 568, 570, 572, 574, 575, 576, 580, 581, 582, 583, 584, 585, 588, 589, 590, 594, 595, 598, 603, 605, 608, 609, 610, 611, 612, 616, 618, 620, 621, 623, 624, 627, 630, 635, 636, 637, 638, 640, 642, 644, 645, 646, 648, 649, 650, 651, 654, 657, 658, 660, 663, 664, 665, 666, 667, 670, 671, 672, 675, 676, 678, 679, 680, 682, 684, 685, 688, 689, 690, 693, 696, 700, 702, 703, 704, 705, 707, 708, 710, 711, 712, 713, 714, 715, 720, 725, 726, 728, 730, 731, 735, 736, 740, 741, 742, 744, 748, 752, 754, 756, 759, 760, 762, 763, 765, 767, 768, 770, 774, 775, 776, 777, 780, 781, 782, 783, 784, 786, 790, 791, 792, 793, 798, 799, 800, 804, 805, 806, 808, 810, 812, 814, 816, 817, 819, 824, 825, 826, 828, 830, 832, 833, 836, 837, 840, 847, 848, 850, 851, 852, 854, 855, 856, 858, 860, 864, 868, 869, 870, 871, 872, 873, 874, 876, 880, 882, 884, 888, 890, 891, 893, 896, 897, 899, 900, 901, 903, 904, 909, 910, 912, 913, 915, 917, 918, 920, 923, 924, 925, 928, 930, 931, 935, 936, 938, 940, 944, 945, 946, 948, 949, 950, 952, 954, 957, 960, 962, 963, 966, 968, 969, 972, 975, 976, 979, 980, 981, 986, 987, 988, 989, 990, 992, 994, 996, 999) — "Egyptian Fractions" by Ron Knott at Surrey University