Category Archives: Mathematics

Spiral Artefact #2

by in Arithmetic, Integer Sequences, Mathematics, Ulam Spirals and tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Why stop at primes? Those are the numbers the Ulam spiral is usually used for. You get a grid of square blocks, then move outward from the middle of the grid in a spiral, counting as you go. If the count matches a prime, you fill the block in. The first block is 1. Not filled. The second block is 2, which is prime. So the block is filled. The third block is 3, which is prime. Filled again. And so on. In the end, the Ulam spiral for primes looks like this:

The Ulam spiral of prime numbers

But why stop at primes? If you change the fill-test, you get different patterns. I’ve recently tried a test based on how many ways a number can be represented as the sum of consecutive integers. For example, 5, 208 and 536 can be represented in only one way:

5 = 2+3
208 = 10 + 11 + 12 + 13 + 14 + 15 + 16 + 17 + 18 + 19 + 20 + 21 + 22
536 = sum(26..41) = 26 + 27 + 28 + 29 + 30 + 31 + 32 + 33 + 34 + 35 + 36 + 37 + 38 + 39 + 40 + 41

Let’s use “runsum” to mean a sum of consecutive integers. If the function runsum(n) returns the count of runsums for n, then runsum(5) = runsum(208) = runsum(536) = 1. Here are spirals for runsum(n) = 1:

A spiral for runsum(n) = 1, i.e. numbers that are the sum of consecutive integers in only one way

runsum(n) = 1 (higher resolution)

runsum(n) = 1 (higher resolution still)

Now try runsum(n) = 2, i.e. numbers that are the sum of consecutive integers in exactly two ways:

A spiral for runsum(n) = 2

runsum(n) = 2 (hi-res #1)

runsum(n) = 2 (hi-res #2)

runsum(n) = 2 (hi-res #3)

Why do most of the numbers fall on a diagonal? I don’t know, but I know that the diagonal represents square numbers:

9 = sum(4..5) = sum(2..4)
25 = sum(12..13) = sum(3..7)
36 = sum(11..13) = sum(1..8)
49 = sum(24..25) = sum(4..10)

Now try runsum(n) = 3:

A spiral for runsum(n) = 3

runsum(n) = 3 (hi-res)

It’s a densely packed spiral, unlike the spiral for runsum(n) = 4:

A spiral for runsum(n) = 4

runsum(n) = 4 (hi-res)

Like the spiral for runsum(n) = 2, the numbers are disproportionately falling on the diagonal of square numbers:

81 = 9^2 = sum(40..41) = sum(26..28) = sum(11..16) = sum(5..13)
324 = 18^2 = sum(107..109) = sum(37..44) = sum(32..40) = sum(2..25)
2500 = 50^2 = sum(498..502) = sum(309..316) = sum(88..112) = sum(43..82)

Here are spirals for runsum(n) = 5:

A spiral for runsum(n) = 5 (note patterns in green)

runsum(n) = 5 (hi-res #1)

runsum(n) = 5 (hi-res #2)

There are two interesting patterns in the spiral, marked in green above and enlarged below:

Pattern #1 in spiral for runsum(n) = 5

Pattern #2 in spiral for runsum(n) = 5

Are the patterns merely artefacts or does one or both represent something mathematically significant? I don’t know.

More spirals:

A spiral for runsum(n) = 6

A spiral for runsum(n) = 7

runsum(n) = 7 (hi-res)

A spiral for runsum(n) = 8

runsum(n) = 8 (hi-res #1)

runsum(n) = 8 (hi-res #2)

Numbers in the spiral for runsum(n) = 8 are again falling disproportionately on the diagonal of square numbers. Here’s one of those squares:

441 = 21^2 = sum(220..221) = sum(146..148) = sum(71..76) = sum(60..66) = sum(45..53) = sum(25..38) = sum(16..33) = sum(11..31)

Previously Pre-Posted…

• Spiral Artefact #1 — a look at patterns in spirals with different tests

The Hex Fractor #3

by in Fractals, Geometry, Mathematics, Triangles and tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

In “Diamonds to Dust”, I showed how the Mitsubishi logo could be turned into a fractal, like this:

The Mitsubishi diamonds (source)

↓

↓

Mitsubishi logo to fractal (animated)

Now I want to look at another famous symbol and its fractalization. Here’s the symbol, the hexagram:

Hexagram, a six-pointed star

The hexagram can be dissected into twelve equilateral triangles like this:

Hexagram dissected into 12 equilateral triangles

If each triangle in the dissection is replaced by a hexagram, then the hexagram is dissected again into twelve triangles, you get a famous fractal, the Koch snowflake:

The Koch snowflake

The Koch snowflake again

Hexagram to Koch snowflake (animated)

If you color the triangles, you get something like this:

Colored hexagram to fractal (animated)

Of course, this is a very inefficient way to create a Koch snowflake, because the interior hexagrams consume processing time while not contributing to the fractal boundary of the snowflake. But in a way you can fully fractalize the hexagram if you draw only the point at the center of each triangle and then color it according to how many times the pixel in question has been drawn on before. To see how this works, first look at what happens when the center-points are represented in white:

White center-points (animated)

And here’s the fully fractalized hexagram, with colored center-points:

Colored center-points (animated)

Previously Pre-Posted…

• The Hex Fractor #1 — hexagons and fractals
• The Hex Fractor #2 — hexagons and fractals again
• Diamonds to Dust — turning the Mitsubishi logo into a fractal

Trim Pickings

by in Fractals, Geometry, Mathematics, Rep-Tiles, Triangles and tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Here is an equilateral triangle divided into nine smaller equilateral triangles:

Rep-9 equilateral triangle

The triangle is a rep-tile — it’s tiled with repeating copies of itself. In this case, it’s a rep-9 triangle. Each of the nine smaller triangles can obviously be divided in their turn:

Rep-81 equilateral triangle

Rep-729 equilateral triangle

Rep-729 equilateral triangle again

Rep-6561 equilateral triangle

Rep-9 triangle repeatedly subdividing (animated)

How try trimming the original rep-9 triangle, picking one of the trimmings, and repeating in finer detail. If you choose six triangles in this pattern, you can create a symmetrical braided fractal:

Triangular fractal stage 1

Triangular fractal #2

Triangular fractal #3

Triangular fractal #3 (cleaning up)

Triangular fractal #3 (cleaning up more)

Triangular fractal #4

Triangular fractal #5

Triangular fractal #6

Triangular fractal (animated)

But this fractal using a three-triangle trim-picking isn’t symmetrical:

Trim-picking #1

Trim-picking #2

Trim-picking #3

Trim-picking #4

Trim-picking #5

To make it symmetric, you have to delay the trim, using the full rep-9 trim for the first stage:

Delayed trim-picking #1

Delayed trim-picking #2

Delayed trim-picking #3

Delayed trim-picking #4

Delayed trim-picking #5

Delayed trim-picking #6 (with first two stages as rep-9)

Delayed trim-picking (animated)

Here are some more delayed trim-pickings used to created symmetrical patterns:

Polykoch (Kontinued)

by in Fractals, Geometry, Mathematics, Polygons, Squares, Triangles and tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

In “Polykoch!”, I looked at variants on the famous Koch snowflake, which is created by erecting new triangles on the sides of an equilaternal triangle, like this:

Koch snowflake #1

Koch snowflake #2

Koch snowflake #3

Koch snowflake #4

Koch snowflake #5

Koch snowflake #6

Koch snowflake #7

Koch snowflake (animated)

One variant is simple: the new triangles move inward rather than outward:

Inverted Koch snowflake #1

Inverted Koch snowflake #2

Inverted Koch snowflake #3

Inverted Koch snowflake #4

Inverted Koch snowflake #5

Inverted Koch snowflake #6

Inverted Koch snowflake #7

Inverted Koch snowflake (animated)

Or you can alternate between moving the new triangles inward and outward. When they always move outward and have sides 1/5 the length of the sides of the original triangle, the snowflake looks like this:

When they move inward, then always outward, the snowflake looks like this:

And so on:

Now here’s a Koch square with its new squares moving inward:

Inverted Koch square #1

Inverted Koch square #2

Inverted Koch square #3

Inverted Koch square #4

Inverted Koch square #5

Inverted Koch square #6

Inverted Koch square (animated)

And here’s a pentagon with squares moving inwards on its sides:

Pentagon with squares #1

Pentagon with squares #2

Pentagon with squares #3

Pentagon with squares #4

Pentagon with squares #5

Pentagon with squares #6

Pentagon with squares (animated)

And finally, an octagon with hexagons on its sides. First the hexagons move outward, then inward, then outward, then inward, then outward:

Octagon with hexagons #1

Octagon with hexagons #2

Octagon with hexagons #3

Octagon with hexagons #4

Octagon with hexagons #5

Octagon with hexagons (animated)

Polykoch!

by in Fractals, Geometry, φ, Mathematics, Pentagons, Phi, Squares, Triangles and tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

This is how you form the famous Koch snowflake, in which at each stage you erect a new triangle on the middle of each line whose sides are 1/3 the length of the line:

Koch snowflake #1

Koch snowflake #2

Koch snowflake #3

Koch snowflake #4

Koch snowflake #5

Koch snowflake #6

Koch snowflake #7

Koch snowflake (animated)

Here’s a variant of the Koch snowflake, with new mid-triangles whose sides are 1/2 the length of the lines:

Koch snowflake (1/2 side) #1

Koch snowflake (1/2 side) #2

Stage #3

Stage #4

Stage #5

Stage #6

Stage #7

Stage #8

Koch snowflake (1/2 side) (animated)

But why stop at triangles? This is a Koch square, in which at each stage you erect a new 1/3 square on the middle of each line:

Koch square #1

Koch square #2

Koch square #3

Koch square #4

Koch square #5

Koch square #6

Koch square (animated)

And a Koch pentagon, in which at each stage you erect a pentagon on the middle of each line whose sides are 1 – (1/φ^2 * 2) = 0·236067977… the length of the line (I used 55/144 as an approximation of 1/φ^2):

Koch pentagon (side 55/144) #1

Koch pentagon #2

Koch pentagon #3

Koch pentagon #4

Koch pentagon #5

Koch pentagon #6

Koch pentagon (animated)

In this close-up, you can see how precisely the sprouting pentagons kiss at each stage:

Koch pentagon (close-up) #1

Koch pentagon (close-up) #2

Koch pentagon (close-up) #3

Koch pentagon (close-up) #4

Koch pentagon (close-up) #5

Koch pentagon (close-up) #6

Koch pentagon (close-up) (animated)

Period Panes

by in Arithmetic, Base Behavior, Circles, Geometry, Mathematics, Reciprocals and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

In his Penguin Dictionary of Curious and Interesting Numbers (1986), David Wells says that 142857 is “beloved of all recreational mathematicians”. He then says it’s the decimal period of the reciprocal of the fourth prime: “1/7 = 0·142857142857142…” And the reciprocal has maximum period. There are 6 = 7-1 digits before repetition begins, unlike the earlier prime reciprocals:


1/2 = 0·5
1/3 = 0·333...
1/5 = 0·2
1/7 = 0·142857 142857 142...

In other words, all possible remainders appear when you calculate the decimals of 1/7:


1*10 / 7 = 1 remainder 3 → 0·1
3*10 / 7 = 4 remainder 2 → 0·14
2*10 / 7 = 2 remainder 6 → 0·142
6*10 / 7 = 8 remainder 4 → 0·1428
4*10 / 7 = 5 remainder 5 → 0·14285
5*10 / 7 = 7 remainder 1 → 0·142857
1*10 / 7 = 1 remainder 3 → 0·142857 1
3*10 / 7 = 4 remainder 2 → 0·142857 14
2*10 / 7 = 2 remainder 6 → 0·142857 142...

That happens again with 1/17 and 1/19, but Wells says that “surprisingly, there is no known method of predicting which primes have maximum period.” It’s a simple question that involves some deep mathematics. Looking at prime reciprocals is like peering through a small window into a big room. Some things are easy to see, some are difficult and some are presently impossible.

In his discussion of 142857, Wells mentions one way of peering through a period pane: “The sequence of digits also makes a striking pattern when the digits are arranged around a circle.” Here is the pattern, with ten points around the circle representing the digits 0 to 9:

The digits of 1/7 = 0·142857142…

But I prefer, for further peers through the period-panes, to create the period-panes using remainders rather than digits. That is, the number of points around the circle is determined by the prime itself rather than the base in which the reciprocal is calculated:

The remainders of 1/7 = 1, 3, 2, 6, 4, 5…

Period-panes can look like butterflies or bats or bivalves or spiders or crabs or even angels. Try the remainders of 1/13. This prime reciprocal doesn’t have maximum period: 1/13 = 0·076923 076923 076923… So there are only six remainders, creating this pattern:

remainders(1/13) = 1, 10, 9, 12, 3, 4

The multiple 2/13 has different remainders and creates a different pattern:

remainders(2/13) = 2, 7, 5, 11, 6, 8

But 1/17, 1/19 and 1/23 all have maximum period and yield these period-panes:

remainders(1/17) = 1, 10, 15, 14, 4, 6, 9, 5, 16, 7, 2, 3, 13, 11, 8, 12

remainders(1/19) = 1, 10, 5, 12, 6, 3, 11, 15, 17, 18, 9, 14, 7, 13, 16, 8, 4, 2

remainders(1/23) = 1, 10, 8, 11, 18, 19, 6, 14, 2, 20, 16, 22, 13, 15, 12, 5, 4, 17, 9, 21, 3, 7

It gets mixed again with the prime 73, which doesn’t have maximum period and yields a plethora of period-panes (some patterns repeat with different n * 1/73, so I haven’t included them):

remainders(1/73)

remainders(2/73)

remainders(3/73)

remainders(4/73)

remainders(5/73)

remainders(6/73)

remainders(9/73)

remainders(11/73) (identical to pattern of 5/73)

remainders(12/73)

remainders(18/73)

101 yields a plethora of period-panes, but they’re variations on a simple theme. They look like flapping wings in this animated gif:

remainders of n/101 (animated)

The remainders of 137 yield more complex period-panes:

remainders of n/137 (animated)

And what about different bases? Here are period-panes for the remainders of 1/17 in bases 2 to 16:

remainders(1/17) in base 2

remainders(1/17) in b3

remainders(1/17) in b4

remainders(1/17) in b5

remainders(1/17) in b6

remainders(1/17) in b7

remainders(1/17) in b8

remainders(1/17) in b9

remainders(1/17) in b10

remainders(1/17) in b11

remainders(1/17) in b12

remainders(1/17) in b13

remainders(1/17) in b14

remainders(1/17) in b15

remainders(1/17) in b16

remainders(1/17) in bases 2 to 16 (animated)

But the period-panes so far have given a false impression. They’ve all been symmetrical. That isn’t the case with all the period-panes of n/19:

remainders(1/19) in b2

remainders(1/19) in b3

remainders(1/19) in b4 = 1, 4, 16, 7, 9, 17, 11, 6, 5 (asymmetrical)

remainders(1/19) in b5 = 1, 5, 6, 11, 17, 9, 7, 16, 4 (identical pattern to that of b4)

remainders(1/19) in b6

remainders(1/19) in b7

remainders(1/19) in b8

remainders(1/19) in b9

remainders(1/19) in b10 (identical pattern to that of b2)

remainders(1/19) in b11

remainders(1/19) in b12

remainders(1/19) in b13

remainders(1/19) in b14

remainders(1/19) in b15

remainders(1/19) in b16

remainders(1/19) in b17

remainders(1/19) in b18

remainders(1/19) in bases 2 to 18 (animated)

Here are a few more period-panes in different bases:

remainders(1/11) in b2

remainders(1/11) in b7

remainders(1/13) in b6

remainders(1/43) in b6

remainders in b2 for reciprocals of 29, 37, 53, 59, 61, 67, 83, 101, 107, 131, 139, 149 (animated)

And finally, to performativize the pun of “period pane”, here are some period-panes for 1/29, whose maximum period will be 28 (NASA says that the “Moon takes about one month to orbit Earth … 27.3 days to complete a revolution, but 29.5 days to change from New Moon to New Moon”):

remainders(1/29) in b4

remainders(1/29) in b5

remainders(1/29) in b8

remainders(1/29) in b9

remainders(1/29) in b11

remainders(1/29) in b13

remainders(1/29) in b14

remainders(1/29) in various bases (animated)

Nexcelsior

by in Integer Sequences, Mathematics, Triangular Numbers and tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

In “The Trivial Troot”, I looked at what happens when tri(k), the k-th triangular number, is one digit longer than the previous triangular number, tri(k-1):


6 = tri(3)
10 = tri(4)

91 = tri(13)
105 = tri(14)

990 = tri(44)
1035 = tri(45)
[...]

↓

10 ← 4
105 ← 14
1035 ← 45
10011 ← 141
100128 ← 447
1000405 ← 1414
10001628 ← 4472
100005153 ← 14142
1000006281 ← 44721
10000020331 ← 141421
100000404505 ← 447214
1000001326005 ← 1414214
10000002437316 ← 4472136
100000012392316 ← 14142136
[...]

What’s going on with k? In a sense, it’s calculating the square roots of 2 and 20:

√2 = 1·414213562373095048801688724209698078569671875376948073176679738...
√20 = 4·472135954999579392818347337462552470881236719223051448541794491...

Now let’s say “Excelsior!” and go higher with a related sequence. A006003 is defined at the Online Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences as the “sum of the next n natural numbers”. Here it is:


1 = 1
5 = 2 + 3
15 = 4 + 5 + 6
34 = 7 + 8 + 9 + 10
65 = 11 + 12 + 13 + 14 + 15
111 = 16 + 17 + 18 + 19 + 20 + 21
175 = 22 + 23 + 24 + 25 + 26 + 27 + 28
260 = 29 + 30 + 31 + 32 + 33 + 34 + 35 + 36
369 = 37 + 38 + 39 + 40 + 41 + 42 + 43 + 44 + 45
505 = 46 + 47 + 48 + 49 + 50 + 51 + 52 + 53 + 54 + 55
671 = 56 + 57 + 58 + 59 + 60 + 61 + 62 + 63 + 64 + 65 + 66
870 = 67 + 68 + 69 + 70 + 71 + 72 + 73 + 74 + 75 + 76 + 77 + 78
1105 = 79 + 80 + 81 + 82 + 83 + 84 + 85 + 86 + 87 + 88 + 89 + 90 + 91
1379 = 92 + 93 + 94 + 95 + 96 + 97 + 98 + 99 + 100 + 101 + 102 + 103 + 104 + 105
1695 = 106 + 107 + 108 + 109 + 110 + 111 + 112 + 113 + 114 + 115 + 116 + 117 + 118 + 119 + 120
2056 = 121 + 122 + 123 + 124 + 125 + 126 + 127 + 128 + 129 + 130 + 131 + 132 + 133 + 134 + 135 + 136
2465 = 137 + 138 + 139 + 140 + 141 + 142 + 143 + 144 + 145 + 146 + 147 + 148 + 149 + 150 + 151 + 152 + 153
2925 = 154 + 155 + 156 + 157 + 158 + 159 + 160 + 161 + 162 + 163 + 164 + 165 + 166 + 167 + 168 + 169 + 170 + 171
3439 = 172 + 173 + 174 + 175 + 176 + 177 + 178 + 179 + 180 + 181 + 182 + 183 + 184 + 185 + 186 + 187 + 188 + 189 + 190
4010 = 191 + 192 + 193 + 194 + 195 + 196 + 197 + 198 + 199 + 200 + 201 + 202 + 203 + 204 + 205 + 206 + 207 + 208 + 209 + 210
[...]

If you’re familiar with triangular numbers, you’ll see that sumnext(k) is always higher than tri(k), except for sumnext(1) = 1 = tri(k). Now, this is what happens when sumnext(k) is one digit longer than sumnext(k-1):


5 = sumnext(2)
15 = sumnext(3)

65 = sumnext(5)
111 = sumnext(6)

870 ← 12
1105 ← 13

9855 ← 27
10990 ← 28

97585 ← 58
102719 ← 59

976625 ← 125
1000251 ← 126

9951391 ← 271
10061960 ← 272

99588644 ← 584
100101105 ← 585

997809119 ← 1259
1000188630 ← 1260

9995386529 ← 2714
10006439295 ← 2715
[...]

↓

15 ← 3
111 ← 6
1105 ← 13
10990 ← 28
102719 ← 59
1000251 ← 126
10061960 ← 272
100101105 ← 585
1000188630 ← 1260
10006439295 ← 2715
100049490449 ← 5849
1000188006300 ← 12600
10000910550385 ← 27145
100003310078561 ← 58481
1000021311323825 ← 125993
10000026341777165 ← 271442
100000232056567634 ← 584804
1000002262299152685 ← 1259922
10000004237431278525 ← 2714418
100000026858987459346 ← 5848036
1000000119305407615071 ← 12599211
10000000921801015908705 ← 27144177
100000001209342964609615 ← 58480355
1000000000250317736274865 ← 125992105
10000000037633414521952245 ← 271441762
100000000183357362892853070 ← 584803548
1000000000250317673908773025 ← 1259921050
[...]

What’s going on now? In a sense, the digits of k are approximating the cube roots of 20, 200 and 2000:


2.714417616594906571518089469679489204805107769489096957284365443... = cuberoot(20)
5.848035476425732131013574720275845557060997270202060082845147020... = cuberoot(200)
12.59921049894873164767210607278228350570251464701507980081975112... = cuberoot(2000)

cuberoot(20) = 2.714417616594906571518089469679489204805107769489096957284365443...
cuberoot(200) = 5.848035476425732131013574720275845557060997270202060082845147020...
cuberoot(2000) = 12.59921049894873164767210607278228350570251464701507980081975112...

So you could say that this sequence has gone nexcelsior: sumnext(k) > tri(k); cubes are higher than squares; and (20, 200, 2000) is bigger than (2, 20).

Previously Pre-Posted…

• “The Trivial Troot” — explaining the earlier pattern in triangular numbers

Pirouetting the Perimeter

by in Geometry, Mathematics, Triangles and tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Imagine a ballerina pirouetting on the perimeter of an equilateral triangle. Suppose that her armlength is half the radius of the circumscribed circle. If her right arm is represented in green and her right hand in yellow, this is one path that her right hand might trace, depending on the relative speeds of her feet and her pirouettes:

The perimeter of an equilateral triangle

A ballerina pirouetting on the perimeter stage #1

Perimeter pirouette #2

Perimeter pirouette #3

Perimeter pirouette #4

Perimeter pirouette #5

Perimeter pirouette #6

Perimeter pirouette #7

Perimeter pirouette #8

Perimeter pirouette #9

Perimeter pirouette #10

[…]

↓

[…]

Perimeter pirouette #128

Perimeter pirouettes (animated)

The right hand of the ballerina during the pirouettes

The full path traced by the ballerina’s right hand

The paths change as you adjust speed and direction (clockwise or anticlockwise) of the pirouettes, the armlength of the ballerina, and so on:

speed = 0.5 (pirouettes)

speed = 0.5 (path)

speed = -1 (anticlockwise pirouettes)

speed = -1 (path)

speed = 1, armlength = 1/3 (pirouettes)

speed = 1, armlength = 1/3 (path)

speed = -0.5 (pirouettes)

speed = -0.5 (path)

speed = -0.75 (pirouettes)

speed = -0.75 (path)

And what about the paths produced by pirouettes on the perimeters of other polygons? Watch this space.

Grow Fourth

by in Arithmetic, Integer Sequences, Mathematics, Powers and tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Write the integers in groups of one, two, three, four… numbers like this:

1, 2,3, 4,5,6, 7,8,9,10, 11,12,13,14,15, 16,17,18,19,20,21, 22,23,24,25,26,27,28, 29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36, 37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45, 46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55, 56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66…

Now delete every second group:

1, 2,3, 4,5,6, 7,8,9,10, 11,12,13,14,15, 16,17,18,19,20,21, 22,23,24,25,26,27,28, 29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36, 37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45, 46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55, 56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66…

↓↓↓

1, 4,5,6, 11,12,13,14,15, 22,23,24,25,26,27,28, 37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45, 56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66…

The sum of the first n remaining groups equals n^4:

1 = 1 = 1^4

1 + 4+5+6 = 16 = 2^4

1 + 4+5+6 + 11+12+13+14+15 = 81 = 3^4

1 + 4+5+6 + 11+12+13+14+15 + 22+23+24+25+26+27+28 = 256 = 4^4

1 + 4+5+6 + 11+12+13+14+15 + 22+23+24+25+26+27+28 + 37+38+39+40+41+42+43+44+45 = 625 = 5^4

1 + 4+5+6 + 11+12+13+14+15 + 22+23+24+25+26+27+28 + 37+38+39+40+41+42+43+44+45 + 56+57+58+59+60+61+62+63+64+65+66 = 1296 = 6^4

1 + 4+5+6 + 11+12+13+14+15 + 22+23+24+25+26+27+28 + 37+38+39+40+41+42+43+44+45 + 56+57+58+59+60+61+62+63+64+65+66 + 79+80+81+82+83+84+85+86+87+88+89+90+91 = 2401 = 7^4

1 + 4+5+6 + 11+12+13+14+15 + 22+23+24+25+26+27+28 + 37+38+39+40+41+42+43+44+45 + 56+57+58+59+60+61+62+63+64+65+66 + 79+80+81+82+83+84+85+86+87+88+89+90+91 + 106+107+108+109+110+111+112+113+114+115+116+117+118+119+120 = 4096 = 8^4

1 + 4+5+6 + 11+12+13+14+15 + 22+23+24+25+26+27+28 + 37+38+39+40+41+42+43+44+45 + 56+57+58+59+60+61+62+63+64+65+66 + 79+80+81+82+83+84+85+86+87+88+89+90+91 + 106+107+108+109+110+111+112+113+114+115+116+117+118+119+120 + 137+138+139+140+141+142+143+144+145+146+147+148+149+150+151+152+153 = 6561 = 9^4

From David Wells’ Penguin Dictionary of Curious and Interesting Numbers (1986), entry for “81”