Category Archives: Mathematics

The Wyrm Ferns

by in Aesthetics, Dragon Curves, Fractals, Geometry, Mathematics and tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

A fern is a fractal, a shape that contains copies of itself at smaller and smaller scales. That is, part of a fern looks like the fern as a whole:

Fern as fractal (source)

Millions of years after Mother Nature, man got in on the fract, as it were:

The Sierpiński triangle, a 2d fractal

The Sierpiński triangle is a fractal created in two dimensions by a point jumping halfway towards one or another of the three vertices of a triangle. And here is a fractal created in one dimension by a point jumping halfway towards one or another of the two ends of a line:

A 1d fractal

In one dimension, the fractality of the fractal isn’t obvious. But you can try draggin’ out (or dragon out) the fractality of the fractal by ferning the wyrm, as it were. Suppose that after the point jumps halfway towards one or another of the two points, it’s rotated by some angle around the midpoint of the two original points. When you do that, the fractal becomes more and more obvious. In fact, it becomes what’s called a dragon curve (in Old English, “dragon” was wyrm or worm):

Fractal with angle = 5°

Fractal 10°

Fractal 15°

Fractal 20°

Fractal 25°

Fractal 30°

Fractal 35°

Fractal 40°

Fractal 45°

Fractal 50°

Fractal 55°

Fractal 60°

Fractal 0° to 60° (animated at ezGif)

But as the angle gets bigger, an interesting aesthetic question arises. When is the ferned wyrm, the dragon curve, at its most attractive? I’d say it’s when angle ≈ 55°:

Fractal 50°

Fractal 51°

Fractal 52°

Fractal 53°

Fractal 54°

Fractal 55°

Fractal 56°

Fractal 57°

Fractal 58°

Fractal 59°

Fractal 60°

Fractal 50° to 60° (animated)

At angle >= 57°, I think the dragon curve starts to look like some species of bristleworm, which are interesting but unattractive marine worms:

A bristleworm, Nereis virens (see polychaete at Wikipedia)

Finally, here’s what the ferned wyrm looks like in black-and-white and when it’s rotating:

Fractal 0° to 60° (b&w, animated)

Fractal 56° (rotating)

Fractal 56° (b&w, rotating)

Double fractal 56° (b&w, rotating)

Previously Pre-Posted (Please Peruse)…

• Curvous Energy — a first look at dragon curves
• Back to Drac’ — another look at dragon curves

Graph durch Euler

by in Arithmetic, Mathematics, Prime numbers and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

This is the famous Ulam spiral, in which prime numbers are represented on filled squares on a square spiral:

The Ulam spiral

I like the way the spiral sits between chaos and calm. It’s not wholly random and it’s not wholly regular — it’s betwixt and between. You get a similar chaos-and-calm vibe from a graph for a function called Euler phi. And primes are at work there too. Here’s the graph from Wikipedia:

Graph of eulerphi(n) = φ(n) (see Euler’s totient function)

But what is the Euler phi function? For any integer n, eulerphi(n) gives you the count of numbers < n that are relatively prime to n. That is, the count of numbers < n that have no common factors with n other than one. You can see how eulerphi(n) works by considering whether you can simplify the fraction a/b, where a = 1..n-1 and b = n:

φ(6) = 2
1/6 (1)
2/6 → 1/3
3/6 → 1/2
4/6 → 2/3
5/6, ∴ φ(6) = 2

φ(7) = 6
1/7 (1)
2/7 (2)
3/7 (3)
4/7 (4)
5/7 (5)
6/7, ∴ φ(7) = 6

φ(12) = 4
1/12 (1)
2/12 → 1/6
3/12 → 1/4
4/12 → 1/3
5/12 (2)
6/12 → 1/2
7/12 (3)
8/12 → 2/3
9/12 → 3/4
10/12 → 5/6
11/12, ∴ φ(12) = 4

φ(13) = 12
1/13 (1)
2/13 (2)
3/13 (3)
4/13 (4)
5/13 (5)
6/13 (6)
7/13 (7)
8/13 (8)
9/13 (9)
10/13 (10)
11/13 (11)
12/13, ∴ φ(13) = 12

As you can see, eulerphi(n) = n-1 for primes. Now you know what the top line of the Eulerphi graph is. It’s the primes. Here’s a bigger version of the graph:

Graph of eulerphi(n) = φ(n)

Unlike the Ulam spiral, however, the Eulerphi graph is cramped. But it’s easy to stretch it. You can represent φ(n) as a fraction between 0 and 1 like this: phifrac(n) = φ(n) / (n-1). Using phifrac(n), you can create Eulerphi bands, like this:

Eulerphi band, n <= 1781

Eulerphi band, n <= 3561

Eulerphi band, n <= 7121

Eulerphi band, n <= 14241

Or you can create Eulerphi discs, like this:

Eulerphi disc, n <= 1601

Eulerphi disc, n <= 3201

Eulerphi disc, n <= 6401

Eulerphi disc, n <= 12802

Eulerphi disc, n <= 25602

But what is the bottom line of the Eulerphi bands and inner ring of the Eulerphi discs, where φ(n) is smallest relative to n? Well, the top line or outer ring is the primes and the bottom line or inner ring is the primorials (and their multiples). The function primorial(n) is the multiple of the first n primes:

primorial(1) = 2
primorial(2) = 2*3 = 6
primorial(3) = 2*3*5 = 30
primorial(4) = 2*3*5*7 = 210
primorial(5) = 2*3*5*7*11 = 2310
primorial(6) = 2*3*5*7*11*13 = 30030
primorial(7) = 2*3*5*7*11*13*17 = 510510
primorial(8) = 2*3*5*7*11*13*17*19 = 9699690
primorial(9) = 2*3*5*7*11*13*17*19*23 = 223092870
primorial(10) = 2*3*5*7*11*13*17*19*23*29 = 6469693230

Here are the numbers returning record lows for φfrac(n) = φ(n) / (n-1):

φ(4) = 2 (2/3 = 0.666…)
4 = 2^2
φ(6) = 2 (2/5 = 0.4)
6 = 2.3
φ(12) = 4 (4/11 = 0.363636…)
12 = 2^2.3
[…]
φ(30) = 8 (8/29 = 0.275862…)
30 = 2.3.5
φ(60) = 16 (16/59 = 0.27118…)
60 = 2^2.3.5
[…]
φ(210) = 48 (48/209 = 0.229665…)
210 = 2.3.5.7
φ(420) = 96 (96/419 = 0.2291169…)
420 = 2^2.3.5.7
φ(630) = 144 (144/629 = 0.228934…)
630 = 2.3^2.5.7
[…]
φ(2310) = 480 (480/2309 = 0.2078822…)
2310 = 2.3.5.7.11
φ(4620) = 960 (960/4619 = 0.20783719…)
4620 = 2^2.3.5.7.11
[…]
30030 = 2.3.5.7.11.13
φ(60060) = 11520 (11520/60059 = 0.191811385…)
60060 = 2^2.3.5.7.11.13
φ(90090) = 17280 (17280/90089 = 0.1918103209…)
90090 = 2.3^2.5.7.11.13
[…]
φ(510510) = 92160 (92160/510509 = 0.18052571061…)
510510 = 2.3.5.7.11.13.17
φ(1021020) = 184320 (184320/1021019 = 0.18052553…)
1021020 = 2^2.3.5.7.11.13.17
φ(1531530) = 276480 (276480/1531529 = 0.180525474868579…)
1531530 = 2.3^2.5.7.11.13.17
φ(2042040) = 368640 (368640/2042039 = 0.18052544540040616…)
2042040 = 2^3.3.5.7.11.13.17

Primal Polynomial

by in Arithmetic, Mathematics, Prime numbers and tagged , , , | Leave a comment

n² + n + 17 is one of the best-known polynomial formulas for primes. Its values for n = 0 to 15 are all prime, starting with 17 and ending with 257. — David Wells in The Penguin Dictionary of Curious and Interesting Numbers (1986), entry for “17”

• 17, 19, 23, 29, 37, 47, 59, 73, 89, 107, 127, 149, 173, 199, 227, 257

Squaring the Triangle

by in Circles, Fractals, Geometry, Mathematics, Sierpiński triangle, Triangles and tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

It’s an interesting little exercise in elementary trigonometry to turn the Sierpiński triangle…

A Sierpiński triangle

…into its circular equivalent:

A Sierpiński trisc

You could call that a trisc, because it’s a triangle turned into a disc. And here’s triangle-and-trisc in one image:

Sierpiński triangle + Sierpiński trisc

But what’s the square equivalent of a Sierpiński triangle? This is:

Square from Sierpiński triangle

You can do that directly, as it were:

Sierpiński triangle → square

Or you can convert the triangle into a disc, then the disc into a square, like this:

Sierpiński triangle → trisc → square

Now try converting the triangle into a pentagon:

Pentagon from Sierpiński triangle

Sierpiński triangle → pentagon

Sierpiński triangle → trisc → pentagon

And a hexagon:

Hexagon from Sierpiński triangle

Sierpiński triangle → hexagon

Sierpiński triangle → trisc → hexagon

But you can also convert the Sierpiński trisc back into a Sierpiński triangle, then into a Sierpiński trisc again:

Sierpiński triangle → trisc → triangle → trisc

Sierpiński triangle → trisc → triangle → trisc (animated at Ezgif)

Sierpiński triangle → trisc → triangle → trisc (b&w)

Sierpiński triangle → trisc → triangle → trisc (b&w) (animated at Ezgif)

After triangles come squares. Here’s a shape called a T-square fractal:

T-square fractal

And here’s the circular equivalent of a T-square fractal:

T-square fractal → T-squisc

T-square fractal + T-squisc

If a disc from a triangle is a trisc, then a disc from a square is a squisc (it would be pentisc, hexisc, heptisc for pentagonal, hexagonal and heptagonal fractals). Here’s the octagonal equivalent of a T-square fractal:

Octagon from T-square fractal

As with the Sierpiński trisc, you can use the T-squisc to create the T-octagon:

T-square fractal → T-squisc → T-octagon (color)

Or you can convert the T-square directly into the T-octagon:

T-square fractal to T-octagon fractal

But using the squisc makes for interesting multiple images:

T-square fractal → T-squisc → T-octagon (b&w)

T-square fractal → T-squisc → T-octagon → T-squisc

T-square fractal → T-squisc → T-octagon → T-squisc (animated at Ezgif)

The conversions from polygon to polygon look best when the number of sides in the higher polygon are a multiple of the number of sides in the lower, like this:

Sierpiński triangle → Sierpiński hexagon → Sierpiński nonagon

Scout the Routes

by in Chaos Game, Fractals, Geometry, Mathematics, Squares and tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Triangles? Yes. Squares? No. If you scout the routes with a triangle, you get a beautiful fractal. If you scout the routes with a square, you don’t. Here’s what you get with a triangle:

A Sierpiński triangle

But how do you scout the routes? (That phrase works best in the American dialects where “scout” rhymes with “route”.) Simple: you mark the final positions reached when a point traces all possible ways of jumping, say, eight times 1/2-way towards the vertices of a polygon. Here’s an animation of a point scouting the routes of eight jumps towards the vertices of a triangle (it starts each time at the center):

Creating a Sierpiński triangle by scouting the routes (animated at Ezgif)

If you scout the routes with a square, you don’t get a fractal. Instead, the interior of the square fills evenly (and boringly) with the end-points of the routes:

Scouting the routes with a square (animated at Ezgif)

But you can create fractals with a square if you out routes as you scout routes. That is, if you exclude some routes and don’t mark their end-points. One way to do this is to compare the proposed next jump-vertex (vertex-jumped-towards) with the previous jump-vertex. For example, if the proposed jump-vertex, jv[t], is the same as the previous jump-vertex, jv[t-1], you don’t jump towards jv[t] or you jump towards it in a different way. The test is jv[t] = jv[t-1] + vi. If vi = 0 and you jump towards the clockwise neighbor of jv when the test is true, you get a fractal looking like this:

vi = 0, action = jv → jv + 1

Here’s the fractal if you jump towards the clockwise-neighbor-but-one when the test is true:

vi = 0, action = jv + 2

Now try varying the vi of the jv[t-1] + vi:

vi = 2, action = jv + 2

vi = 2, action = jv + 1

vi = 3, action = jv + 1

Or what about jumping in a different way towards jv when the test is true? If you jump 2/3 of the way rather 1/2, you get his fractal:

vi = 2, action = jump 2/3

And if you jump 4/3 of the way (i.e., you overshoot the vertex jv), you get this fractal:

vi = 0, action = jump 4/3rds to vertex

vi = 0, jump 4/3 (guide-square removed)

vi = 2, jump 4/3rds (guide-square removed)

And in this fractal the point jumps 2/3 of the way to the center of the square when the test is true:

vi = 2, action = jump 2/3rds of way to center of square

But why apply only one test to jv[1] and use only when one alternative jump? If jv[t] = jv[t-1] + 1 or jv[t] = jv[t-1] + 3, jv[t] becomes jv[t]+1 or jv[t]+3, respectively, you get this fractal:

vi = 1, jv + 1; vi = 3, jv + 3

Here are more fractals created by single and double tests:

vi = 1, jv + 1

vi = 0, jump 2/3

vi = 0, jump towards center 2/3rds

vi = 1, jump-center 2/3

vi = 2, jump 1/3; vi = 3, jump 1/1 (i.e, 1)

vi = 0, jv + 2; vi = 2, jump-center 1/2

vi = 0, jv + 2; vi = 2, jump-center 2/3

vi = 0, jv + 2; vi = 2, jump-center 4/3

vi = 0, jv + 1; vi = 2, jump 2/3

vi = 0, jv + 2; vi = 2, jump 2/3

vi = 0, jump 4/3; vi = 2, jv + 2

vi = 0, jump 2/3; vi = 2, jv + 1

vi = 0, jump 4/3; vi = 1, jv + 2

vi = 0, jump 2/3; vi = 2, jump 1/3

vi =0, jump 1/3; vi = 2, jump 2/3

vi = 0, jump 0/1 (i.e, 0); vi = 2, jump 1/3

Primal Pellicles

by in Arithmetic, Base Behavior, Integer Sequences, Mathematics, Prime numbers and tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Numbers have thin skins. And they’re easily replaced. Take 71624133. Here it is permuting its pellicles:

71624133 in base 10 = 100010001001110010111000101 in base 2 = 11222202212211200 in b3 = 10101032113011 in b4 = 121313433013 in b5 = 11035053113 in b6 = 1526536500 in b7 = 421162705 in b8 = 158685750 in b9 = 374802A9 in b11 = 1BBA1199 in b12 = 11AB9B59 in b13 = 9726137 in b14 = 644BE73 in b15 = F3855B7 in b16

But if digits are the skin of 71624133, what are its bones? Well, you could say the skeleton of a number, something that doesn’t change from base to base, is its prime factorization:

71624133 = 32 × 72 × 162413

But the primes themselves are numbers, so they’re wearing pellicles too. And it turns out that, in base 10, the pellicles of the prime factors of 71624133 match the pellicle of 71624133 itself:

71624133 = 32.72.162413

Here’s a list of primal pellicles in base 10:

735 = 3.5.72
3792 = 24.3.79
1341275 = 52.13.4127
13115375 = 53.7.13.1153
22940075 = 52.229.4007
29373375 = 3.53.29.37.73
71624133 = 32.72.162413
311997175 = 52.7.172.31.199
319953792 = 27.3.53.79.199
1019127375 = 32.53.7.127.1019
1147983375 = 3.53.7.11.83.479
1734009275 = 52.173.400927
5581625072 = 24.5581.62507
7350032375 = 53.7.23.73.5003
17370159615 = 34.5.17.59.61.701
33061224492 = 22.33.306122449
103375535837 = 72.37.103.553583
171167303912 = 23.11.172.6730391
319383665913 = 3.133.19.383.6659
533671737975 = 34.52.17.53.367.797
2118067737975 = 32.52.7.79.211.80677
3111368374257 = 3.112.132.683.74257
3216177757191 = 3.73.191.757.21617
3740437158475 = 52.37.4043715847
3977292332775 = 3.52.292.233.277.977
4417149692375 = 53.7.23.4969.44171
7459655393232 = 24.32.72.23.45965539
7699132721175 = 3.52.72.27211.76991
7973529228735 = 3.5.7.972.2287.3529
10771673522535 = 34.5.67.71.107.52253

You can find them at the Online Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences under A121342, “Composite numbers that are a concatenation of their distinct prime divisors in some order.” But what about pairs of primal pellicles, that is, pairs of numbers where the prime factors of each form the pellicle of the other?

35 = 5.7 ↔ 75 = 3.52
1275 = 3.52.17 ↔ 3175 = 52.127
131715 = 32.5.2927 ↔ 329275 = 52.13171
3199767 = 3.359.2971 ↔ 35932971 = 3.19.67.972
14931092 = 22.11.61.5563 ↔ 116155632 = 24.3.109.1492

And here are a few primal pellicles I’ve found in other bases:

Primal Pellicles in Base 2

1111011011110 = 10.1110.110110111 in b2 = 7902 = 2.32.439 in b10
1110001100110111 = 1110.10111.100011001 in b2 = 58167 = 32.23.281 in b10
1111011011011110 = 10.1110.110110110111 in b2 = 63198 = 2.32.3511 in b10
11101001100001101 = 1110.101.101001100001 in b2 = 119565 = 32.5.2657 in b10
1111011011011011110 = 10.1110.110110110110111 in b2 = 505566 = 2.32.28087 in b10
1111011111101111011 = 1110.1011.10111.11011111 in b2 = 507771 = 32.11.23.223 in b10

Primal Pellicles in Base 3

121022 = 210.12.102 in b3 = 440 = 23.5.11 in b10
212212 = 22.21.212 in b3 = 644 = 22.7.23 in b10
20110112 = 210.201.1011 in b3 = 4712 = 23.19.31 in b10
21110110 = 10.212.1101 in b3 = 5439 = 3.72.37 in b10
121111101 = 122.111.1101 in b3 = 12025 = 52.13.37 in b10
222112121 = 22.21.221121 in b3 = 19348 = 22.7.691 in b10
2202122021 = 22.2021.22021 in b3 = 54412 = 22.61.223 in b10
120212201221 = 2.122.21.201.1202 in b3 = 312550 = 2.52.7.19.47 in b10

Primal Pellicles in Base 7

2525 = 2.52.25 in b7 = 950 = 2.52.19 in b10
3210 = 2.34.10 in b7 = 1134 = 2.34.7 in b10
5252 = 2.52.52 in b7 = 1850 = 2.52.37 in b10
332616 = 33.16.326 in b7 = 58617 = 33.13.167 in b10
336045 = 32.5.3604 in b7 = 59715 = 32.5.1327 in b10
2251635 = 22.3.5.16.252 in b7 = 281580 = 22.3.5.13.192 in b10

Primal Pellicles in Base 11

253 = 22.3.52 in b11 = 300 = 22.3.52 in b10
732 = 2.32.72 in b11 = 882 = 2.32.72 in b10
2123 = 23.33.12 in b11 = 2808 = 23.33.13 in b10
3432 = 25.3.43 in b11 = 4512 = 25.3.47 in b10
3710 = 32.72.10 in b11 = 4851 = 32.72.11 in b10
72252 = 23.72.225 in b11 = 105448 = 23.72.269 in b10

Primal Pellicles in Base 15

275 = 24.5.7 in b15 = 560 = 24.5.7 in b10
2D5 = 2.52.D in b15 = 650 = 2.52.13 in b10
2CD5 = 2.52.CD in b15 = 9650 = 2.52.193 in b10
7BE3 = 3.72.BE in b15 = 26313 = 3.72.179 in b10
21285 = 24.52.128 in b15 = 105200 = 24.52.263 in b10

Lime Time

by in Arithmetic, Circles, Fractals, Geometry, Integer Sequences, Mathematics and tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

What do you get if you list every successive pair of entries in this sequence?

1, 2, 1, 3, 2, 3, 1, 4, 3, 4, 1, 5, 2, 5, 3, 5, 4, 5, 1, 6, 5, 6, 1, 7, 2, 7, 3, 7, 4, 7, 5, 7, 6, 7, 1, 8, 3, 8, 5, 8, 7, 8, 1, 9, 2, 9, 4, 9, 5, 9, 7, 9, 8, 9, 1, 10, 3, 10, 7, 10, 9, 10, 1, 11, 2, 11, 3, 11, 4, 11, 5, 11, 6, 11, 7, 11, 8, 11, 9, 11, 10, 11, 1, 12, 5, 12, 7, 12, 11, 12, 1, 13, … — A038568 at the Online Encyclopedia of Integer Sequence

You get the rational fractions ordered by denominator in their simplest form: 1/2, 1/3, 2/3, 1/4, 3/4, 1/5, 2/5, 3/5… There are no pairs like 2/4 and 5/35, because those can be simplified: 2/4 → 1/2; 15/35 → 3/7. You can get the same set of rational fractions by listing every successive pair in this sequence, the Stern-Brocot sequence:

1, 2, 1, 3, 2, 3, 1, 4, 3, 5, 2, 5, 3, 4, 1, 5, 4, 7, 3, 8, 5, 7, 2, 7, 5, 8, 3, 7, 4, 5, 1, 6, 5, 9, 4, 11, 7, 10, 3, 11, 8, 13, 5, 12, 7, 9, 2, 9, 7, 12, 5, 13, 8, 11, 3, 10, 7, 11, 4, 9, 5, 6, 1, 7, 6, 11, 5, 14, 9, 13, 4, 15, 11, 18, 7, 17, 10, 13, 3, 14, 11, 19, 8, 21, 13, 18, 5, 17, 12, 19, … — A002487 at the OEIS

But the fractions don’t come ordered by denominator this time. In fact, they seem to come at random: 1/2, 1/3, 2/3, 1/4, 3/5, 2/5, 3/4, 1/5, 4/7, 3/8, 5/7, 2/7, 5/8… But they’re not random at all. There’s a complicated way of generating them and a simple way. An amazingly simple way, I think:

Moshe Newman proved that the fraction a(n+1)/a(n+2) can be generated from the previous fraction a(n)/a(n+1) = x by 1/(2*floor(x) + 1 – x). The successor function f(x) = 1/(floor(x) + 1 – frac(x)) can also be used. — A002487, “Stern-Brocot Sequence”, at the OEIS

In another form, the Stern-Brocot sequence is generated by what’s called the Calkin-Wilf Tree. Now suppose you use the Stern-Brocot sequence to supply the x co-ordinate of an L-graph whose arms run from 0 to 1. And you use the Calkin-Wilf Tree to supply the y co-ordinate of the L-tree. What do you get? As I described in “I Like Gryke”, you get this fractal:

Limestone fractal

I call it a limestone fractal or pavement fractal or gryke fractal, because it reminds me of the fissured patterns you see in the limestone pavements of the Yorkshire Dales:

Fissured limestone pavement, Yorkshire Dales (Wikipedia)

But what happens when you plot the (x,y) of the Stern-Brocot sequence and the Calkin-Wilf Tree on a circle instead? You get an interestingly distorted limestone fractal:

Limestone fractal on circle

You can also plot the (x,y) around the perimeter of a polygon, then stretch the polygon into a circle. Here’s a square:

Limestone fractal on square

⇓

Limestone square stretched to circle

And here are a pentagon, hexagon, heptagon and octagon — note the interesting perspective effects:

Limestone fractal on pentagon

⇓

Limestone pentagon stretched to circle

Limestone fractal on hexagon

⇓

Limestone hexagon stretched to circle

Limestone fractal on heptagon

⇓

Limestone heptagon stretched to circle

Limestone fractal on octagon

⇓

Limestone octagon stretched to circle

And finally, here are animations of limestone polygons stretching to circles:

Limestone square stretched to circle (animated at EZgif)

Limestone pentagon to circle (animated)

Limestone hexagon to circle (animated)

Limestone heptagon to circle (animated)

Limestone octagon to circle (animated)

Previously Pre-Posted (Please Peruse)

• I Like Gryke — a first look at the limestone fractal

Summer-Time Twos

by in Arithmetic, Base Behavior, Mathematics and tagged , | Leave a comment

I wondered how often the digits of n2 appeared in sum(n1,n2). For example:

17 → 117 = sum(9,17)
20 → 200 = sum(5,20); 204,4; 207,3; 209,2 (c=4)

As I looked at higher n2, I found that the 2-views continued:

63 → 363 = sum(58,63); 638,53; 1638,28; 1763,23; 1863,18 (c=5)
88 → 1288 = sum(73,88); 2788,48; 2881,46; 3388,33; 3880,9; 3888,8 (c=6)
200 → 20009 = sum(14,200); 20022,13; 20034,12; 20045,11; 20055,10; 20064,9;
20072,8; 20079,7; 20085,6; 20090,5; 20094,4; 20097,3; 20099,2 (c=13)
558 → 39558 = sum(483,558); 55833,448; 95583,348; 105558,318; 125580,247; 126558,243; 143558,158; 152558,83; 155583,28; 155808,18; 155825,17; 155841,16; 155856,15; 155870,14; 155883,13; 155895,12 (c=16)
2000 → 2000010 = sum(45,2000); 2000054,44; 2000097,43; 2000139,42; 2000180,41; 2000220,40; 2000259,39; 2000297,38; 2000334,37; 2000370,36; 2000405,35; 2000439,34; 2000472,33; 2000504,32; 2000535,31; 2000565,30;
2000594,29; 2000622,28; 2000649,27; 2000675,26; 2000700,25; 2000724,24; 2000747,23; 2000769,22; 2000790,21; 2000810,20; 2000829,19; 2000847,18; 2000864,17; 2000880,16; 2000895,15; 2000909,14; 2000922,13; 2000934,
12; 2000945,11; 2000955,10; 2000964,9; 2000972,8; 2000979,7; 2000985,6; 2000990,5; 2000994,4; 2000997,3; 2000999,2 (c=44)

But what about other bases?

Base 9

15 in b9 → 115 = sum(5,15) (n=14 in b10) (c=1)
18 in b9 → 118 = sum(11,17); 180,1 (n=17 in b10) (c=2)
20 in b9 → 203 = sum(4,18); 206,3; 208,2 (n=18 in b10) (c=3)
45 in b9 → 445 = sum(32,41); 745,25; 1045,15; 1145,5 (n=41 in b10) (c=4)
55 in b9 → 555 = sum(41,50); 1055,35; 1355,25; 1555,15; 1655,5 (n=50 in b10) (c=5)
65 in b9 → 665 = sum(50,59); 1265,45; 1665,35; 2065,25; 2265,15; 2365,5 (n=59 in b10) (c=6)
75 in b9 → 775 = sum(59,68); 1475,55; 2075,45; 2475,35; 2750,26; 2775,25; 3075,15; 3175,5 (n=68 in b10) (c=8)
85 in b9 → 885 = sum(68,77); 1685,65; 2385,55; 2885,45; 3385,35; 3685,25; 3853,17; 3885,15; 4085,5 (n=77 in b10) (c=9)
200 in b9 → 20003 = sum(13,162); 20016,13; 20028,12; 20040,11; 20050,10; 20058,8; 20066,7; 20073,6; 20078,5; 20083,4; 20086,3; 20088,2 (n=162 in b10) (c=12)
415 in b9 → 13415 = sum(311,338); 25415,345; 36415,315; 41525,302; 46415,275; 55415,245; 63415,215; 64155,212; 70415,175; 75415,145; 80415,115; 83415,75; 85415,45; 86415,15 (n=338 in b10) (c=14)
[…]
2000 in b9 → 2000028 = sum(38,1458); 2000070,41; 2000120,40; 2000158,38; 2000206,37; 2000243,36; 2000278,35; 2000323,34; 2000356,33; 2000388,32; 2000430,31; 2000460,30; 2000488,28; 2000526,27; 2000553,26; 2000578,25; 2000613,24; 2000636,23; 2000658,22; 2000680,21; 2000710,20; 2000728,18; 2000746,17; 2000763,16; 2000778,15; 2000803,14; 2000816,13; 2000828,12; 2000840,11; 2000850,10; 2000858,8; 2000866,7; 2000873,6; 2000878,5; 2000883,4; 2000886,3; 2000888,2 (n=1458 in b10) (c=37)

Base 11

16 in b11 → 116 = sum(6,16) (n=17 in b10) (c=1)
20 in b11 → 201 = sum(5,22); 205,4; 208,3; 20A,2 (n=22 in b10) (c=4)
56 in b11 → 556 = sum(50,61); 956,36; 1156,26; 1356,16; 1456,6 (n=61 in b10) (c=5)
66 in b11 → 666 = sum(61,72); 1066,46; 1466,36; 1669,2A; 1766,26; 1966,16; 1A66,6 (n=72 in b10) (c=7)
86 in b11 → 886 = sum(83,94); 1486,66; 1A86,56; 2486,46; 2886,36; 3086,26; 3286,16; 3386,6 (n=94 in b10) (c=8)
96 in b11 → 996 = sum(94,105); 1696,76; 2296,66; 2896,56; 3296,46; 3696,36; 3996,26; 4096,16; 4196,6 (n=105 in b10) (c=9)
A6 in b11 → AA6 = sum(105,116); 18A6,86; 25A6,76; 31A6,66; 37A6,56; 41A6,46; 45A6,36; 48A6,26; 4AA6,16; 50A6,6 (n=116 in b10) (c=10)
200 in b11 → 1200A = sum(156,242); 20001,15; 20015,14; 20028,13; 2003A,12; 20050,11; 20060,10; 2006A,A; 20078,9; 20085,8; 20091,7; 20097,6; 200A1,5; 200A5,4; 200A8,3; 200AA,2 (n=242 in b10) (c=16)
[…]
A66 in b11 → 1AA66 = sum(1260,1282); A1A66,966; 109A66,946; 182A66,866; 198A66,846; 23A666,786; 253A66,766; 267A66,746; 314A66,666; 326A66,646; 375A66,566; 385A66,546; 416A66,466; 424A66,446; 457A66,366; 463A66,346; 46A666,326; 488A66,266; 492A66,246; 4A6666,186; 4A9A66,166; 501A66,146; 50AA66,66; 510A66,46 (n=1282 in b10) (c=24)
2000 in b11 → 2000005 = sum(52,2662); 2000051,47; 2000097,46; 2000131,45; 2000175,44; 2000208,43; 200024A,42; 2000290,41; 2000320,40; 200035A,3A; 2000398,39; 2000425,38; 2000461,37; 2000497,36; 2000521,35; 2000555,34; 2000588,33; 200060A,32; 2000640,31; 2000670,30; 200069A,2A; 2000718,29; 2000745,28; 2000771,27; 2000797,26; 2000811,25; 2000835,24; 2000858,23; 200087A,22; 20008A0,21; 2000910,20; 200092A,1A; 2000948,19; 2000965,18; 2000981,17; 2000997,16; 2000A01,15; 2000A15,14; 2000A28,13; 2000A3A,12; 2000A50,11; 2000A60,10; 2000A6A,A; 2000A78,9; 2000A85,8; 2000A91,7; 2000A97,6; 2000AA1,5; 2000AA5,4; 2000AA8,3; 2000AAA,2 (n=2662 in b10) (c=51)

Base 3

12 in b3 → 112 = sum(2,12); 120,1 (n=5 in b10) (c=2)
20 in b3 → 120 = sum(4,6); 200,10; 202,2 (n=6 in b10) (c=3)
122 in b3 → 10122 = sum(11,17); 11122,22; 11220,21; 12122,2; 12200,1 (n=17 in b10) (c=5)
1212 in b3 → 121212 = sum(41,50); 1001212,1012; 1101212,212; 1112120,200; 1121212,112; 1201212,12 (n=50 in b10) (c=6)
1222 in b3 → 122222 = sum(44,53); 1101222,1002; 1111222,222; 1112220,221; 1212222,102; 1221222,2; 1222000,1 (n=53 in b10) (c=7)
2000 in b3 → 1112000 = sum(28,54); 1120000,1000; 2000020,21; 2000110,20; 2000122,12; 2000210,11; 2000220,10; 2000222,2 (n=54 in b10) (c=8)
[…]
20000 in b3 → 111120000 = sum(82,162); 111200000,10000; 200000010,111; 200000120,110; 200000222,102; 200001100,101; 200001200,100; 200001222,22; 200002020,21; 200002110,20; 200002122,12; 200002210,11; 200002220,10; 200002222,2 (n=162 in b10) (c=14)

Base 4

13 in b4 → 130 = sum(1,13) (n=7 in b10) (c=1)
20 in b4 → 201 = sum(3,8); 203,2 (n=8 in b10) (c=2)
200 in b4 → 20001 = sum(6,32); 20012,11; 20022,10; 20031,3; 20033,2 (n=32 in b10) (c=5)
2000 in b4 → 2000021 = sum(11,128); 2000103,22; 2000130,21; 2000210,20; 2000223,13; 2000301,12; 2000312,11; 2000322,10; 2000331,3; 2000333,2 (n=128 in b10) (c=10)
20000 in b4 → 200000003 = sum(23,512); 200000121,112; 200000232,111; 200001002,110; 200001111,103; 200001213,102; 200001320,101; 200002020,100; 200002113,33; 200002211,32; 200002302,31; 200002332,30; 200003021,23; 200003103,22; 200003130,21; 200003210,20; 200003223,13; 200003301,12; 200003312,11; 200003322,10; 200003331,3; 200003333,2 (n=512 in b10) (c=22)

Base 8

17 in b8 → 170 = sum(1,17) (n=15 in b10) (c=1)
20 in b8 → 202 = sum(4,16); 205,3; 207,2 (n=16 in b10) (c=3)
200 in b8 → 20011 = sum(11,128); 20023,12; 20034,11; 20044,10; 20053,7; 20061,6; 20066,5; 20072,4; 20075,3; 20077,2 (n=128 in b10) (c=10)
2000 in b8 → 2000020 = sum(32,1024); 2000057,37; 2000115,36; 2000152,35; 2000206,34; 2000241,33; 2000273,32; 2000324,31; 2000354,30; 2000403,27; 2000431,26; 2000456,25; 2000502,24; 2000525,23; 2000547,22; 200057
0,21; 2000610,20; 2000627,17; 2000645,16; 2000662,15; 2000676,14; 2000711,13; 2000723,12; 2000734,11; 2000744,10; 2000753,7; 2000761,6; 2000766,5; 2000772,4; 2000775,3; 2000777,2 (n=1024 in b10) (c=31)

Base 16

1F in b16 → 1F0 = sum(1,1F) (n=31 in b10) (c=1)
20 in b16 → 201 = sum(6,32); 206,5; 20A,4; 20D,3; 20F,2 (n=32 in b10) (c=5)
200 in b16 → 20003 = sum(23,512); 20019,16; 2002E,15; 20042,14; 20055,13; 20067,12; 20078,11; 20088,10; 20097,F; 200A5,E; 200B2,D; 200BE,C; 200C9,B; 200D3,A; 200DC,9; 200E4,8; 200EB,7; 200F1,6; 20
0F6,5; 200FA,4; 200FD,3; 200FF,2 (n=512 in b10) (c=22)
[…]
EE4 in b16 → 42EE4A = sum(961,EE4); 6EE413,16; 6EE428,15; 6EE43C,14; 6EE44F,13; 6EE461,12; 6EE472,11; 6EE482,10; 6EE491,F; 6EE49F,E; 6EE4AC,D; 6EE4B8,C; 6EE4C3,B; 6EE4CD,A; 6EE4D6,9; 6EE4DE,8; 6EE4E5,7; 6EE4EB,6; 6EE4F0,5; 6EE4F4,4; 6EE4F7,3; 6EE4F9,2; 6EE4FA,1 (n=3812 in b10) (c=23)
2000 in b16 → 2000001 = sum(5B,2000); 200005B,5A; 20000B4,59; 200010C,58; 2000163,57; 20001B9,56; 200020E,55; 2000262,54; 20002B5,53; 2000307,52; 2000358,51; 20003A8,50; 20003F7,4F; 2000445,4E; 2000492,4D; 20004DE,4C; 2000529,4B; 2000573,4A; 20005BC,49; 2000604,48; 200064B,47; 2000691,46; 20006D6,45; 200071A,44; 200075D,43; 200079F,42; 20007E0,41; 2000820,40; 200085F,3F; 200089D,3E; 20008DA,3D; 2000916,3C; 2000951,3B; 200098B,3A; 20009C4,39; 20009FC,38; 2000A33,37; 2000A69,36; 2000A9E,35; 2000AD2,34; 2000B05,33; 2000B37,32; 2000B68,31; 2000B98,30; 2000BC7,2F; 2000BF5,2E; 2000C22,2D; 2000C4E,2C; 2000C79,2B; 2000CA3,2A; 2000CCC,29; 2000CF4,28; 2000D1B,27; 2000D41,26; 2000D66,25; 2000D8A,24; 2000DAD,23; 2000DCF,22; 2000DF0,21; 2000E10,20; 2000E2F,1F; 2000E4D,1E; 2000E6A,1D; 2000E86,1C; 2000EA1,1B; 2000EBB,1A; 2000ED4,19; 2000EEC,18; 2000F03,17; 2000F19,16; 2000F2E,15; 2000F42,14; 2000F55,13; 2000F67,12; 2000F78,11; 2000F88,10; 2000F97,F; 2000FA5,E; 2000FB2,D; 2000FBE,C; 2000FC9,B; 2000FD3,A; 2000FDC,9; 2000FE4,8; 2000FEB,7; 2000FF1,6; 2000FF6,5; 2000FFA,4; 2000FFD,3; 2000FFF,2 (n=8192 in b10) (c=90)

Previously Pre-Posted (Please Peruse)

• Summer-Time Hues
• Summer-Climb Views
• Summult-Time Hues

Punctuated Pairimeters

by in Arithmetic, Circles, Geometry, Mathematics and tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Imagine using the digits of n in two different bases to generate two fractions, a/b and c/d, where a/b < 1 and c/d < 1 (see Appendix for a sample program). Now use the fractions to find a pair of points on the perimeter of a circle, (x1, y1) and (x2, y2), then calculate and mark the midpoint of (x1, y1) and (x2, y2). If the bases have a prime factor in common, pretty patterns will appear from this punctuated pairimetry:

b1 = 2; b2 = 6

b1 = 2; b2 = 10

b1 = 2; b2 = 14

b1 = 4; b2 = 10

b1 = 4; b2 = 20

b1 = 4; b2 = 28

b1 = 6; b2 = 42

b1 = 12; b2 = 39

b1 = 24; b2 = 28

b1 = 28; b2 = 40

b1 = 32; b2 = 36

b1 = 42; b2 = 78

Appendix: Sample Program for Pairimetry

GetXY(xyi)=

fr = 0
recip = 1
bs = base[xyi]
for gi = 1 to di[xyi]
recip = recip/bs
fr += d[xyi,gi] * recip
next gi

x[xyi] = xcenter + sin(pi2 * fr) * radius
y[xyi] = ycenter + cos(pi2 * fr) * radius

endproc

Dinc(i1) =

d[i1,1]++;
if d[i1,1] == base[i1] then

i2 = 1

while d[i1,i2] == base[i1]

d[i1,i2] = 0
i2++;
d[i1,i2]++;

endwhile

if i2 > di[i1] then di[i1] = i2 endif

endif

endproc

Drawfigure =

base = x = y = di = array(2)
d = array(2,100)
radius = 100
pi2 = pi * 2
base[1] = 2
base[2] = 6
di[1] = 1
di[2] = 1

while true

for i = 1 to 2
call Dinc(i)
call GetXY(i)
next i

plot (x[1]+x[2]) / 2, (y[1] + y[2]) / 2

endwhile

endproc

call drawfigure

Summult-Time Hues

by in Arithmetic, Integer Sequences, Mathematics and tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

sum(3,6) = 3 * 6 = 18
• 3 * 2.3 = 2.3^2
sum(15,35) = 15 * 35 = 525
• 3.5 * 5.7 = 3.5^2.7
sum(85,204) = 85 * 204 = 17340
• 5.17 * 2^2.3.17 = 2^2.3.5.17^2
sum(493,1189) = 493 * 1189 = 586177
• 17.29 * 29.41 = 17.29^2.41
sum(2871,6930) = 2871 * 6930 = 19896030
• 3^2.11.29 * 2.3^2.5.7.11 = 2.3^4.5.7.11^2.29
sum(16731,40391) = 16731 * 40391 = 675781821
• 3^2.11.13^2 * 13^2.239 = 3^2.11.13^4.239
[…]

Elsewhere Other-Accessible

1, 18, 525, 17340, 586177, 19896030, 675781821, 22956120408, 779829016225, 26491211221770, 899921240562957, 30570830315362260, 1038508305678375841, 35278711540581704598, 1198437683944896688125, 40711602541832856049200, 1382996048733983114022337 — A011906 at the Online Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences