Flowly We Rote

As the old mathematical joke goes: A topologist is someone who can’t tell the difference between a coffee-cup and a donut. That’s because topology is, crudely speaking, the branch of geometry that studies shapes when the distance and angle between one part and another doesn’t matter. For example, how can (or can’t) shapes flow smoothly into each other, without being cut or torn or pierced? The shape of a perfectly plastic substance can flow smoothly from that of a coffee-cup into that of a donut. And vice versa:

Topologically speaking, a coffee-cup is the same as a donut (Wikipedia)


That’s topology in three dimensions. I came across some unexpected topology in two dimensions when I was looking at transformations of a triangle — the Sierpiński triangle, a fractal named after the Polish mathematician Wacław Sierpiński (1882-1969):

Sierpiński triangle


I wondered what happened when you rotate the points inside a Sierpiński triangle while the triangular boundary remains fixed. That is, each point stays at the same position in the width between the center and the boundary as the whole interior flows around the center of the triangle:

Points inside a Sierpiński triangle rotated by 1°


Points inside a Sierpiński triangle rotated by 2°


Points inside a Sierpiński triangle rotated by 3°


Points rotated by 4°


Points rotated by 5°


Points rotated by 10°


Points rotated by 20°


Points rotated by 30°


Points rotated by 40°


Points rotated by 50°


Points rotated by 60°


Points rotated by 70°


Points rotated by 80°


Points rotated by 90°


WARNING! If you’re sensitive to flickering images, please note that there are flickering animated gifs below


Here’s the flowing rotation from 0° to 90° animated in a gif:

Interior points of Sierpiński triangle flowing 0° → 90° around center (animated at ezGif)


And here’s the whole rotating flow from 0° to 120° (which maps the points back onto themselves):

Interior points of Sierpiński triangle flowing continuously around center (slow animation)


Interior points flowing continuously around the center (faster animation)


As you can see, the appearance of the Sierpiński triangle changes notably as the points rotate: the rotations aren’t rotationally symmetrical (in the standard sense). Sometimes a rotation looks like a stumpy triskelion, a three-legged shape like the flag of the Isle of Man:

Triskelion on the Manx flag (Wikipedia)


Interior points of a Sierpiński triangle rotated by 30°


But topologically speaking, each rotated triangle is the same (just as, topologically speaking, a coffee-cup is the same as a donut). You can see how they’re topologically the same by imagining that the triangle is stretched into a circle, like this:

Sierpiński triangle

Sierpiński triangle stretched into circle


When you circularize the rotated triangles, all the circularized triangles are rotationally symmetrical:

Points rotated by 30°

Circle from triangle rotated by 30°


Points rotated by 60°

Circle from triangle rotated by 60°


Points rotated by 90°

Circle from triangle rotated by 90°


Here are two animated gifs of the circularized triangles rotating:

Circularized Sierpiński triangle flowing around center (slow animation at ezGif)


Circularized Sierpiński triangle flowing around center (faster animation)


Here’s what I call the centered Sierpiński triangle turned into a circle:

Centered Sierpiński triangle


Circle from centered Sierpiński triangle


And finally, the circularized centered Sierpiński triangle flowly rotating at two speeds:

Circularized centered Sierpiński triangle flowing around center (slow animation at ezGif)


Circularized centered Sierpiński triangle flowing around center (faster animation)


Know Your Limaçons

Front cover of The Penguin Dictionary of Curious and Interesting Geometry by David WellsThe Penguin Dictionary of Curious and Interesting Geometry, David Wells (1991)

Mathematics is an ocean in which a child can paddle and an elephant can swim. Or a whale, indeed. This book, a sequel to Wells’ excellent Penguin Dictionary of Curious and Interesting Mathematics, is suitable for both paddlers and plungers. Plumbers, even, because you can dive into some very deep mathematics here.

Far too deep for me, I have to admit, but I can wade a little way into the shallows and enjoy looking further out at what I don’t understand, because the advantage of geometry over number theory is that it can appeal to the eye even when it baffles the brain. If this book is more expensive than its prequel, that’s because it needs to be. It’s a paperback, but a large one, to accommodate the illustrations.

Fortunately, plenty of them appeal to the eye without baffling the brain, like the absurdly simple yet mindstretching Koch snowflake. Take a triangle and divide each side into thirds. Erect another triangle on each middle third. Take each new line of the shape and do the same: divide into thirds, erect another triangle on the middle third. Then repeat. And repeat. For ever.

A Koch snowflake (from Wikipedia)

A Koch snowflake (from Wikipedia)

The result is a shape with a finite area enclosed by an infinite perimeter, and it is in fact a very early example of a fractal. Early in this case means it was invented in 1907, but many of the other beautiful shapes and theorems in this book stretch back much further: through Étienne Pascal and his oddly organic limaçon (which looks like a kidney) to the ancient Greeks and beyond. Some, on the other hand, are very modern, and this book was out-of-date on the day it was printed. Despite the thousands of years devoted by mathematicians to shapes and the relationship between them, new discoveries are being made all the time. Knots have probably been tied by human beings for as long as human beings have existed, but we’ve only now started to classify them properly and even find new uses for them in biology and physics.

Which is not to say knots are not included here, because they are. But even the older geometry Wells looks at would be enough to keep amateur and recreational mathematicians happy for years, proving, re-creating, and generalizing as they work their way through variations on all manner of trigonomic, topological, and tessellatory themes.


Previously pre-posted (please peruse):

Poulet’s Propeller — discussion of Wells’ Penguin Dictionary of Curious and Interesting Numbers (1986)