Category Archives: Geometry

Fract-L Geometry

by in Arithmetic, Fibonacci Sequence, Geometry, Mathematics, Triangular Numbers and tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Suppose you set up an L, i.e. a vertical and horizontal line, representing the x,y coordinates between 0 and 1. Next, find the fractional pairs x = 1/2, 1/3, 2/3, 1/4, 2/4…, y = 1/2, 1/3, 2/3, 1/4, 2/4… and mark the point (x,y). That is, find the point, say, 1/5 of the way along the x-line, then the points 1/5, 2/5, 3/5 and 4/5 along the y-line, marking the points (1/5, 1/5), (1/5, 2/5), (1/5, 3/5), (1/5, 4/5). Then find (2/5, 1/5), (2/5, 2/5), (2/5, 3/5), (2/5, 4/5) and so on. Some interesting patterns appear in what I call a Frac-L (pronounced “frackle”) or Fract-L:

Frac-L for 1/2 to 21/22

Frac-L for 1/2 to 48/49

Frac-L for 1/2 to 75/76

Frac-L for 1/2 to 102/103

Frac-L for 1/2 to 102/103 (animated)

If the (x,y) point is first red, then becomes different colors as it is repeatedly found, you get these patterns:

Frac-L for 1/2 to 48/49 (color)

Frac-L for 1/2 to 75/79 (color)

Frac-L for 1/2 to 102/103 (color) (animated)

Now try polygonal numbers. The triangular numbers are 1, 3, 6, 10, 15, 21, 28, 36, 45, 55, 66, 78…, so you’re finding the fractional pairs, say, (1/21, 1/21), (1/21, 3/21, (1/21, 6/21), (1/21, 10/21), (1/21, 15/21), then (3/21, 1/21), (3/21, 3/21, (3/21, 6/21), (3/21, 10/21), (3/21, 15/21), and so on:

Frac-L for triangular fractions

The frac-L for square numbers (1, 4, 9, 16, 25, 36, 49, 64, 81, 100…) is almost identical:

Frac-L for square fractions, e.g. (1/16, 1/16), (1/16, 4/16), (1/16, 9/16)…

So is the frac-L for pentagonal numbers (1, 5, 12, 22, 35, 51, 70, 92, 117, 145, 176, 210, 247, 287, 330…):

Frac-L for pentagonal fractions, e.g. (1/35, 5/35), (1/35, 12/35), (1/35,22/35)…

Here are frac-Ls for tetrahedral and square-pyramidal numbers:

Frac-L for tetrahedral fractions

Frac-L for square pyramidal fractions

But what about prime numbers (skipping 2)? Here the fractional pairs are, say, (1/17, 1/17), (1/17, 3/17), (1/17, 5/17), (1/17, 7/17), (1/17, 11/17), (1/17, 13/17), then (3/17, 1/17), (3/17, 3/17), (3/17, 5/17), (3/17, 7/17), (3/17, 11/17), (3/17, 13/17), and so on:

Frac-L for 1/3 to 73/79 (prime fractions)

Frac-L for 1/3 to 223/227

Frac-L for 1/3 to 307/331

Frac-L for 1/3 to 307/331 (animated)

Frac-L for 1/3 to 73/79 (color) (prime fractions)

Frac-L for 1/3 to 223/227 (color)

Frac-L for 1/3 to 307/331 (color)

Frac-L for 1/3 to 307/331 (color) (animated)

And finally (for now), a frac-L for Fibonnaci numbers, where the fractional pairs are, say, (1/13, /13), (1/13, 2/13), (1/13, 3/13), (1/13, 5/13), (1/13, 8/13), then (2/13, /13), (2/13, 2/13), (2/13, 3/13), (2/13, 5/13), (2/13, 8/13), and so on:

Frac-L for Fibonacci fractions to 14930352/2178309 = fibonacci(36)/fibonacci(37)

Mods and Clockers

by in Fractals, Geometry, Integer Sequences, Mathematics, Triangles and tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

To understand clock-arithmetic, simply picture a clock-face with one hand and a big fat 0 in place of the 12. Now you can do some clock-arithmetic. For example, set the hour-hand to 5, then move on 4 hours. You’ve done this sum:

5 + 4 → 9

Now try 9 + 7. The hour-hand is already on 9, so move forward 7 hours:

9 + 7 → 4

Now try 3 + 8 + 1:

3 + 8 + 1 → 0

And 3 * 4:

4 * 3 = 4 + 4 + 4 → 0

That’s clock-arithmetic. But you’re not confined to 12-hour clocks. Here’s a 7-hour clock, where the 7 is replaced with a 0:

3 + 1 → 4
4 + 5 → 2
2 + 4 + 1 → 0
3 * 3 = 3 + 3 + 3 → 2

Another name for clock-arithmetic is modular arithmetic, because the clocks model the process of dividing a number by 12 or 7 and finding the remainder or residue — 12 or 7 is known as the modulus (and modulo is Latin for “by the modulus”).

5 + 4 = 9 → 9 / 12 = 0*12 + 9

(5 + 4) modulo 12 = 9

3 + 8 + 1 = 12 → 12 / 12 = 1*12 + 0

(3 + 8 + 1) modulo 12 = 0

19 / 12 = 1*12 + 7

19 mod 12 = 7

3 + 1 = 4 → 4 / 7 = 0*7 + 4

(3 + 1) mod 7 = 4

2 + 4 + 1 = 7 → 7 / 7 = 1*7 + 0

(2 + 4 + 1) mod 7 = 0

19 / 7 = 2*7 + 5

19 mod 7 = 5

Modular arithmetic can do wonderful things. One small but beautiful example is the way it can uncover hidden fractals in Pascal’s triangle:

Pascal’s Triangle (via Desmos)

How to create Pascal’s triangle (via Wikipedia)

If you color all numbers n mod 2 = 1 (i.e., odd numbers) in the triangle, they create the famous Sierpiński triangle:

The Sierpiński triangle in Pascal’s triangle (via Fractal Foundation)

↓

Pascal’s triangle, n mod 2 = 1 (click for larger)

The Sierpiński triangle appears like this for all n mod 4 = 2 in Pascal’s triangle:

Pascal’s triangle, n mod 4 = 2 (click for larger)

And so on:

Pascal’s triangle, n mod 8 = 4

Pascal’s triangle, n mod 16 = 8

Pascal’s triangle, n mod 32 = 16

Pascal’s triangle, n mod 64 = 32

Pascal’s triangle, n mod 128 = 64

Pascal’s triangle, n mod 256 = 128

Pascal’s triangle, n mod 2,4,8… = 1,2,4… (animated via EzGif)

Post-Performative Post-Scriptum

There’s no need to calculate Pascal’s triangle in full to find the fractals above. The 10th row of Pascal’s triangle is this:

1, 10, 45, 120, 210, 252, 210, 120, 45, 10, 1

The 20th row is this:

1, 20, 190, 1140, 4845, 15504, 38760, 77520, 125970, 167960, 184756, 167960, 125970, 77520, 38760, 15504, 4845, 1140, 190, 20, 1

And the 29th is this:

1, 29, 406, 3654, 23751, 118755, 475020, 1560780, 4292145, 10015005, 20030010, 34597290, 51895935, 67863915, 77558760, 77558760, 67863915, 51895935, 34597290, 20030010, 10015005, 4292145, 1560780, 475020, 118755, 23751, 3654, 406, 29, 1

But you don’t need to consider those ever-growing numbers in the triangle when you’re finding fractals with modular arithmetic. When the modulus is 2, you just work with 0 and 1, that is, you add the previous numbers in the triangle and find the sum modulo 2. When the modulus is 4, you just work with 0, 1, 2 and 3, adding the numbers and finding the sum modulo 4. When it’s 8, you just work with 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7, finding the sum modulo 8. And so on.

Second Whirled Warp

by in Geometry, Mathematics and tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

In “First Whirled Warp”, I looked at the paths traced by the midpoint of two points moving at varying speeds around the perimeter of a circle or polygon. Now I wanted to look at the midpoint of two points moving on the perimeter of a star. Suppose the star looks like this:

Four-pointed star

If the two points start at the same vertex and one point is moving 1/2 as fast as the other, the midpoint traces a shape like the head of a fox:

Fox-head from midpoint of two points moving in speed-ratio 1/2 : 1 (or 1 : 2)

If one point is moving 1/3 as fast (or 3x faster), the trace looks like this:

Midpoint of two points moving in speed-ratio 1/3 : 1

And if the points are moving -1/3 : 1, that is, in opposite directions (one clockwise, one widdershins):

Speed-ratio -1/3 : 1

And you can adjust all pixels outward so that the outer vertices of the star lie on the perimeter of a circle:

Speed-ratio -1/3 : 1 (circular)

Here are more traces created by the midpoint of two points moving around the perimeter of a four-pointed star:

Speed-ratio 1/5 : 1

Speed-ratio 3/5 : 1

↓

Speed-ratio 3/5 : 1 (circular)

Speed-ratio -3/7 : 1/3

↓

Speed-ratio -3/7 : 1/3 (circular)

Speed-ratio 7/3 : 6/7

↓

Speed-ratio 7/3 : 6/7 (circular)

Speed-ratio -7/3 : 6/7

↓

Speed-ratio -7/3 : 6/7 (circular)

If the star is adjusted like this:

Variant on four-pointed star

You can get mid-traces like this:

Speed-ratio -1/7 : 1 (adjusted star)

↓

Speed-ratio -1/7 : 1 (adjusted star) (circular)

Here’s a three-pointed star:

Speed-ratio -4/5 : 1 (3p star)

↓

Speed-ratio -4/5 : 1 (3p star) (circular)

And some five-pointed stars:

Speed-ratio 2/7 : 1 (5p star)

↓

Speed-ratio 2/7 : 1 (5p star) (circular)

Speed-ratio -7/5 : 3/7 (5p star)

↓

Speed-ratio -7/5 : 3/7 (5p star) (circular)

Elsewhere Other-Accessible…

• First Whirled Warp — an earlier look at points performativizing on perimeters
• Third Whirled Warp — a later look at points performativizing on perimeters

Trigging Triangles

by in Fractals, Geometry, Mathematics, Triangles and tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

A fractal is a shape in which a part looks like the whole. Trees are fractals. And lungs. And clouds. But there are man-made fractals too and probably the most famous of them all is the Sierpiński triangle, invented by the Polish mathematician Wacław Sierpiński (1882-1969):

Sierpiński triangle

There are many ways to create a Sierpiński triangle, but one of the simplest is to trace all possible routes followed by a point jumping halfway towards the vertices of an equilateral triangle. If you mark the endpoint of the jumps, the Sierpiński triangle appears as the routes get longer and longer, like this:

Point jumping 1/2 way towards vertices of an equilateral triangle (animated)

Once you’ve created a Sierpiński triangle like that, you can play with it. For example, you can use simple trigonometry to stretch the triangle into a circle:

Sierpiński triangle to circle stage #1

Sierpiński triangle to circle #2

Sierpiński triangle to circle #3

Sierpiński triangle to circle #4

Sierpiński triangle to circle #5

Sierpiński triangle to circle #6

Sierpiński triangle to circle #7

Sierpiński triangle to circle #8

Sierpiński triangle to circle #9

Sierpiński triangle to circle #10

Sierpiński triangle to Sierpiński circle (animated)

But the trigging of the triangle can go further. You can expand the Sierpiński circle further, like this:

Sierpiński circle expanded

Or shrink the Sierpiński triangle like this:

Shrinking Sierpiński triangle stage #1

Shrinking Sierpiński triangle #2

Shrinking Sierpiński triangle #3

Shrinking Sierpiński triangle #4

Shrinking Sierpiński triangle #5

Shrinking Sierpiński triangle #6

Shrinking Sierpiński triangle (animated)

You can also create new shapes using the jumping-point technique. Suppose that, as the point is jumping, you adjust its position outwards into the circumscribed circle whenever it lands within the boundaries of the governing triangle. But if the point lands outside those boundaries, you leave it alone. Using this adapted technique, you get a shape like this:

Adjusted Sierpiński circle

And if the point is swung by 60° after it’s adjusted into the circle, you get a shape like this:

Adjusted Sierpiński circle (60° swing)

Here are some animated gifs showing these shapes rotating in a full circle at various speeds:

Adjusted Sierpiński circle (swinging animation) (fast)

Adjusted Sierpiński circle (swinging animation) (medium)

Adjusted Sierpiński circle (swinging animation) (slow)

Square Routes Re-Re-Re-Re-Re-Re-Revisited

by in Fractals, Geometry, Mathematics, Pentagons, Polygons, Squares, Triangles and tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Suppose you trace all possible routes followed by a point inside a triangle jumping halfway towards one or another of the three vertices of the triangle. If you mark each jump, you get a famous geometrical shape called the Sierpiński triangle (or Sierpiński sieve).

Sierpiński triangle found by tracing all possible routes for a point jumping halfway towards the vertices of a triangle

The Sierpiński triangle is a fractal, because it contains copies of itself at smaller and smaller scales. Now try the same thing with a square. If you trace all possible routes followed by a point inside a square jumping halfway towards one or another of the four vertices of the square, you don’t get an obvious fractal. Instead, the interior of the square fills steadily (and will eventually be completely solid):

Routes of a point jumping halfway towards vertices of a square

Try a variant. If the point is banned from jumping towards the same vertex twice or more in a row, the routes trace out a fractal that looks like this:

Ban on choosing same vertex twice or more in a row

If the point is banned from jumping towards the vertex one place anti-clockwise of the vertex it’s just jumped towards, you get a fractal like this:

Ban on jumping towards vertex one place anti-clockwise of previously chosen vertex

And if the point can’t jump towards two places clockwise or anti-clockwise of the currently chosen vertex, this fractal appears (called a T-square fractal):

Ban on jumping towards the vertex diagonally opposite of the previously chosen vertex

That ban is equivalent to banning the point from jumping from the vertex diagonally opposite to the vertex it’s just jumped towards. Finally, here’s the fractal created when you ban the point from jumping towards the vertex one place clockwise of the vertex it’s just jumped towards:

Ban on jumping towards vertex one place clockwise of previously chosen vertex

As you can see, the fractal is a mirror-image of the one-place-anti-clockwise-ban fractal.

I discovered the ban-construction of those fractals more than twenty years ago. Then I found that I was re-discovering the same fractals when I looked at what first seemed like completely different ways of constructing fractals. There are lots of different routes to the same result. I’ve recently discovered yet another route. Let’s try what seems like an entirely different way of constructing fractals. Take a square and erect four new half-sized squares, sq1, sq2, sq3, sq4, on each corner. Then erect three more quarter-sized squares on the outward facing corners of sq1, sq2, sq3 and sq4. Carry on doing that and see what happens at the end when you remove all the previous stages of construction:

Animation of the new construction

Animation in black-and-white

It’s the T-square fractal again. Now try rotating the squares you add at stage 3 and see what happens (the rotation means that two new squares are added on adjacent outward-facing corners and one new square on the inward-facing corner):

Animation of the construction

It’s the one-place-clockwise-ban fractal again. Now try rotating the squares two places, so that two new squares are added on diagonally opposite outward-facing corners and one new square on the inward-facing corner:

Animation of the construction

It’s the same-vertex-ban fractal again. Finally, rotate squares one place more:

Animation of the construction

It’s the one-place-clockwise-ban fractal again. And this method isn’t confined to squares. Here’s what happens when you add 5/8th-sized triangles to the corners of triangles:

Animation of the construction

And here’s what happens when you add 5/13th-sized pentagons to the corners of pentagons:

Animation of the construction

Finally, here’s a variant on that pentagonal fractal (adding two rather than four pentagons at stage 3 and higher):

Animation of the construction

Previously pre-posted (please peruse):

• Square Routes
• Square Routes Revisited
• Square Routes Re-Revisited
• Square Routes Re-Re-Revisited
• Square Routes Re-Re-Re-Revisited
• Square Routes Re-Re-Re-Re-Revisited
• Square Routes Re-Re-Re-Re-Re-Revisited